Len Wein Characters Multiple Choice Quiz
Author: Kyra
Kyle Kyra (they/them) writes fiction, nonfiction, and poetry. They live in a sleepy Nebraska town. Yes, corn lives outside their back door. They hold a BFA in creative writing from the University of Nebraska at Omaha, and their work has appeared in Menacing Hedge, Spank the Carp, Danse Macabre, The Door is a Jar, The Collidescope, and other journals and anthologies.
Geekly Tunes: November 2025
Happy Wednesday, Geekly Gang! Today, our writers share what they’ve been listening to over the past month. Feel free to share what you’ve been listening to, Geekly Gang. I’ll begin by sharing my monthly tunes.
Kyra’s Tunes
Typically, I don’t pay much attention to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, but this year’s class was an interesting one. Headliners include Cyndi Lauper, Soundgarden, Joe Cocker, The White Stripes, Chubby Checker, Outkast, and Warren Zevon. Wow! What a group! I’m surprised it took Warren Zevon over 30 years to make the Hall. Notable exclusions like the Excitable Boy himself are the biggest reason why I don’t pay much attention to the Hall’s Inductees. Zevon’s Excitable Boy is a hallmark Rock album. “Ah-woo! Werewolves of London.” And I love “Lawyers, Guns, and Money.” The latter song is as pertinent today as it was when it was first released.
Many members of this inductee class are no longer with us, so several other artists paid tribute. Iggy Pop was hilarious when he sang the beat of The White Stripes’ “Seven-Nation Army.” The entire crowd joined the fun. And while there was a great version of Soundgarden’s “Black Hole Sun,” Lily Cornell Silver’s rendition of “Fell On Black Days,” with a picture of her father (Soundgarden’s lead singer, Chris Cornell) over her shoulder, sends chills.
While “Black Hole Sun” is a banger, I much prefer “Fell On Black Days.” It better explores Cornell’s range. Both Cornells. Lily did her father proud.
I’m getting choked up again. Chris Cornell (and his close friend Linkin Park frontman Chester Bennington) was always upfront about his depression. We lost Cornell and Bennington too soon.
My second entry pulls double duty: it’s a meme and a song. The Remix Brothers did a great job poking fun at President Trump’s Autism announcement from a handful of weeks ago. Here’s a link if you’d like to check out the remix. In short, the study President Trump references during this announcement says the exact opposite of what Trump declares. There is no correlation between Tylenol and Autism. Autism is hereditary. I’m a good example of the rise of Autism diagnoses. My daughter was diagnosed. I had some markers, and there’s a biological component to Autism, so I got checked myself and was diagnosed later in life. Tylenol is the only safe fever reducer pregnant women can take. Unchecked fevers can lead to issues far worse than Autism. Don’t listen to Trump. Returning to The Remix Brothers’ video, it’s eerie how they’re able to make Trump sound like Eminem. The Trump in this video has flow.
Sometimes one must laugh at the Idiocracy The United States has become. The Remix Brother’s “Trump Autism Remix” does a great job of doing that. Trump doesn’t need a third term. Can we get Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho as the 2028 Republican candidate for President?
That’s all I have for this month. Let’s check in with Skye.
Skye’s Tunes
It’s been a minute since I first heard The Rise and Fall of a Midwest Princess, and I was happy to revisit it this month. I forgot how much I enjoyed it. Listening to songs like “Femininomenon,” “After Midnight,” “Pink Pony Club,” and “Casual” reminds me of why this album is in my vinyl collection. I specifically own the Peaches & Cream version, which contains the songs “Super Graphic Ultra Modern Girl,” “HOT TO GO,” “My Kink is Karma,” “Picture You,” and “Kaleidoscope.” While it’s nice knowing I’m lucky to have bonus content, it feels weird having an album with an odd number of sides. I need to remind myself that the D Side is blank, and I’m worried one of these days I’m gonna scratch it by accident.
Despite my love of upbeat pop songs, I enjoy mellow vibes and soothing tracks. Enter The Very Best of Roberta Flack. Songs like “Killing Me Softly with His Song,” “Feel Like Makin’ Love,” “Where Is the Love,” and “If I Ever See You Again” are great for soothing vibes. Some people say that a nap is all you need after a long day of work, but The Very Best of Roberta Flack is all I need. I’ve been meaning to pay homage to Roberta Flack after her passing earlier this year. We’ve lost too many legends recently. Rest in peace.
On a lighter note, Olivia Rodrigo’s SOUR has been another of my staples this month. Rodrigo’s musical stylings are easy to jam to. I get lost in the melodies of songs like “Traitor,” “Drivers License,” “1 Step Forward, 3 Steps Back,” and “Enough for You” while I’m busy working on projects. I can’t deny that part of me is transported back to my teenage years whenever I pop in SOUR. I can’t imagine why that is. I still relate to many themes present in SOUR. Wherever Olivia is, I hope she’s okay.
Sublime is another classic album from my childhood. Understandably, my parents never shared the entire album with me and my sister, but certain (clean) songs quickly became staples. We would sing “Santeria” or “What I Got” as loud as we could. Being a kid, I never understood anything these songs were saying, but I loved them just because we were having fun. I love the nostalgic feelings I get from this album.
That’s all we have for this month’s Geekly Tunes. Let us know what music you’ve been listening to over the past month, Geekly Gang. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.
Sweet Emoji: 90s Music 02
Geekly Casting: Mega Man Film
Happy Monday, Geekly Gang! We’re bringing back the Geekly Casting series, and today’s subject is a live-action Mega Man film. There were talks about a Netflix Mega Man film, but we haven’t heard much about this project since late 2021. A lot has changed since then. Mega Man even had an episode in Amazon Prime’s Secret Level series, a television series based on random video games. But the Blue Bomber deserves a big screen adaptation. Kyra Kyle here. As usual, I’ll start this post and share modern actors who could play the various roles, and Skye, our movie geek, will search Hollywood’s past and present for the best possible actors to play each role.
Our first order of business is figuring out which characters we need to cast. We’ll keep Rock’s supporting cast short: Dr. Light, Roll, and maybe another character or two. We won’t bother casting Rush. He’ll be a robo-dog, so they’ll record random dog noises. Dr. Wily’s an obvious inclusion. We’ll skip casting Yellow Devil; he’ll mostly grunt. The Robot Masters pose a difficult challenge. Skull Man must make the cast because he was a main antagonist in Mega Man’s manga, but the other Robot Masters should have a balanced power set and come from popular games in the Mega Man series. This is a tall order. We’ll do our best.
Mega Man/Rock: Cameron Crovetti
I considered several actors to play the title role in Mega Man. Malachi Barton’s range intrigued me. I could even see an unknown take on the role, but I landed on Cameron Crovetti.
Crovetti is best known for his role on the Amazon Prime series The Boys. He portrays Homelander’s son, so Crovetti has experience with characters with questionable backgrounds. While Mega Man doesn’t go as dark as The Boys, Rock has a conflicted relationship with humanity. Crovetti has several comedic roles under his belt, too, so he has range. I could see him portray the Blue Bomber.
Honestly, the Crovetti family could sport more than one role in Mega Man. Cameron’s twin brother, Nicholas, portrayed Max Wright in Big Little Lies. If Mega Man included Copy Robot, and the production company wanted to avoid using CGI to make Copy Robot look eerily similar to Mega Man, Nicholas Crovetti makes sense. The Crovetti brothers have an older sister, Isabella, who could portray Roll. Roll and Rock (Mega Man) are considered siblings in the Mega Man universe, so it makes sense for Isabella Crovetti to play Roll, but let’s go with a different actor.
Roll: Lulu Wilson
Lulu Wilson is best known for horror films and television series like Ouija: Origin of Evil, Annabelle: Creation, The Haunting of Hill House, and Fall of the House of Usher. Wilson even portrayed a young Gloria Steinem in The Glorias. Despite a short career, she has an impressive filmography. Wilson also has a handful of comedic roles under her belt, specifically the dark comedy Wyrm. So, Wilson has the range to pull off Rock’s older sister Roll.
Typically, Roll comes off as compassionate and patient, but Mega Man 11, the most recent entry in the mainline Mega Man series, shows her giving Auto (another Mega Man side character who could make an appearance) a hard time. Let’s face it. Roll can be brutal toward Auto in Mega Man 11. Roll also doesn’t mind joining Rock (Mega Man) in battle. Lulu Wilson could pull off a Roll who looks overtly demure, but has a hidden edge, begging to be set free.
Dr. Thomas Light: Pierce Brosnan
Honestly, I could’ve gone with the Mega Man fan consensus and picked Jeff Bridges. Bridges has been the lovable bearded man for decades; he would make a great Dr. Light. Instead, I’m going with Pierce Brosnan. Mega Man depicts Dr. Light as a kind-hearted father figure and little else. After all, Light created Rock, Roll, and X. Brosnan has portrayed father figures in the past, but he may bring another layer to the character that a generic fatherly actor wouldn’t. Don’t ask me what that layer is. That’s up to Brosnan to pull deep from his acting experience.
Dr. Albert Wily: Willem Dafoe
Willem Dafoe as Dr. Albert Wily may be typecasting. Who cares? I went off-center with Brosnan as Dr. Light; Dafoe is at his best when his character has a tenuous grasp on reality. Whoever portrays Dr. Wily needs a disconnect with reality. Only a madman would put the world at risk by turning robots (who were minding their own business) against humanity. Dafoe could easily pull off an unhinged Dr. Wily.
Skull Man: Javier Bardem
We’ve reached the Robot Masters. Woo hoo! Whoever fills these roles won’t need to match the look of their counterpart. The Robot Masters will predominantly be CGI.
We begin with Skull Man. Unlike most Robot Masters, Skull Man was designed specifically for combat. Dr. Wily built Skull Man to take down Mega Man. While other Robot Masters have personalities outside of “must destroy Mega Man” (other Robot Masters are coerced or brainwashed), Skull Man is a killer who will stop at nothing to end Mega Man. Again, this may be typecasting, but Javier Bardem has been that level of cold-blooded killer.
Skull Man shows little emotion. He struggles to make a connection with any of the other Robot Masters. He has a hollow, inhuman affect. Like many other actors on this list, Bardem would give Skull Man an extra layer of character.
Metal Man: Peter Dinklage
Even when he isn’t brainwashed, Metal Man is a jerk. Sarcasm is Metal Man’s first language. He treats the other Robot Masters like buffoons, cracking jokes at their expense. To be fair, few of the other Robot Masters figure out they’re the butt of Metal Man’s joke. Yep. Peter Dinklage could easily pull off an affable, wisecracking Metal Man. Dinklage could find the perfect blend of fun and danger. Couldn’t you see Dinklage tossing saw blades like they’re Frisbees?
Splash Woman: Kristen Bell
Splash Woman first appeared in the Mega Man comic book. She began as a hero. The Mega Man comic built up Splash Woman’s stakes ahead of Mega Man 9, so when she gets brainwashed in the game, players would care. Splash Woman is Mega Man’s karaoke-loving bestie. She may have been constructed for underwater repairs, but musical theater is Splash Woman’s passion. Kristen Bell has the musical training and comedic timing to pull off Splash Woman. Bell’s Splash Woman could be a villain in the first Mega Man film, or she could be converted in the sequel. Hmm.
Fire Man: Nikolaj Coster-Waldau
Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Peter Dinklage could have a mini Game of Thrones reunion. That would be fun. It would also be fun to watch Coster-Waldau take on Fire Man, a Robot Master who believes he’s the hero. That’s right. Fire Man suffers from main character syndrome. Game of Thrones had several “main characters,” so Coster-Waldau as Fire Man works on a meta storytelling level. I can see Mega Man jokingly follow Fire Man as the main character for a scene. I can also see Nikolaj Coster-Waldau playing a hot-headed–a little on the nose–Fire Man.
Elec Man: Joaquin Phoenix
Were some of these Robot Masters brainwashed, or were they nudged? Conceited and egotistical, Elec Man walks a tightrope between kindhearted and sadistic freak. Joaquin Phoenix has portrayed his fair share of characters like Elec Man. I can hear Phoenix pull off a line like, “To watch my beautiful bolts fly to the top of your head. To hear your delightful shrieks.” Woah! Elec Man may have some issues.
Ice Man: Neil Patrick Harris
Ice Man loves to show off for the crowd. The world’s a stage, and he’ll give Splash Woman a run for her money as Mega Man’s best singer. Neil Patrick Harris has a flair for the dramatic. I’ve heard he’s a good singer, too. Wink. Harris’s Ice Man and the actor who I have playing Bomb Man could have more than one musical number. One of them needs to be a Mega Man variant of “Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better.” Make it happen.
Guts Man: Terry Crews
Built for construction, Guts Man takes his job seriously. While he may perform physical labor, Guts Man is smarter than he looks. He can be over-dramatic with a penchant for sudden outbursts, but Guts Man cares deeply for his coworkers. Underneath his bulky exterior, Guts Man’s a big softy, just like my pick to portray him, Terry Crews. Sure, I want to see Crews in more films. But you read Guts Man’s description. Tell me that doesn’t scream Terry Crews.
Bomb Man: Wayne Brady
Bomb Man is another Robot Master with a flair for the dramatic. While he doesn’t necessarily sing in the Mega Man series, who says he can’t in the movie? I have mixed feelings about How I Met Your Mother, but Wayne Brady and Neil Patrick Harris would be another fun reunion. Brady and Harris’s chemistry is undeniable, and I’d love to see how Bomb Man and Ice Man would interact with each other. They’re too similar, fighting for the same spotlight. Anything you can freeze, I can explode!
That’s the cast I have for Mega Man. Let’s check in with our film geek, Skye.
Skye’s Picks
I’m not well-versed in the Mega Man game series. I’ve beaten the first one and gotten halfway through the second, so my knowledge of the lore and characters is limited. Because of that, all my picks for this post were actors who made me giggle. My version of Mega Man is more kid-friendly and goofy. I hope these picks aren’t blasphemous. Either way, enjoy my picks for a Mega Man feature film adaptation.
Mega Man/Rock: Mark Hamill (Young)
Let’s see, someone who’s fresh-faced, eager to explore, lovable in his ignorance with just the right amount of whininess sprinkled in. I couldn’t help but imagine young Mark Hamill playing Mega Man. I’m unsure if that’s the best representation of Mega Man’s character (please refer to my intro), but it’s at least compelling. If nothing else, we know Hamill started his career playing that exact archetype. Seeing him learn and upgrade himself as he “cuts” (hehe) through the various bosses would be believable. With the tutelage of Obi-Wan–I mean Dr. Light–young Hamill could easily become another iconic sci-fi protagonist.
Roll: Dakota Fanning (Younger)
Roll was tricky for me to cast, but I remembered I had cast Fanning’s sister in a previous casting call (Geekly Casting: X-Men in the MCU). Since I prefer not to repeat actors I’ve already cast, why not Dakota? Like her younger sister, Elle, Dakota Fanning has had a storied acting career. I could see her pulling off Roll’s kind-hearted and bubbly personality. Since I cast young Mark Hamill as Mega Man/Rock, I thought it would make more sense to cast Fanning in her 20s. Rock n’ Roll are meant to be siblings, so it’d be a bit weird if they weren’t close in age. She’s got the look, style, and personality, so let’s give her the Roll. See what I did there?
Dr. Thomas Light: Patrick Stewart
I shouldn’t have to explain this one. Come on, it’s Patrick Stewart. Patrick Stewart is one of the go-to actors for good-natured, smart old dudes. Dr. Light would be no exception. Stewart has unrivaled on-screen charisma, a decades-long career under his belt, and the ability to make any movie he’s in better. Stewart works as Dr. Light. I won’t even bother naming them all, y’all already know. The only issue is his distinct lack of hair, but it’s Hollywood. They can figure out something.
Dr. Albert Wily: Ian McKellen
After casting Patrick Stewart as Dr. Light, it only felt right to go with Ian McKellen as Dr. Wily. If you’re a member of the Geekly Gang, you probably know why I made this choice. Not only are Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen two peas in a pod, but they work off each other in ways unlike any other acting duo in Hollywood. They’ve had several roles and done countless productions together, but the rivalry between Light and Wily is mostly why I went with McKellen. Given their past playing Professor X and Magneto, Stewart and McKellen would foil each other perfectly for the Light/Wily rivalry. Now, I badly want to watch this Mega Man movie. Make it so, Hollywood!
Skull Man: Ken Page (Posthumously)
If we’re going the kid-friendly and goofy route, Ken Page as Skull Man makes a marketable, mildly intimidating, and memorable choice. I admit it. I was thinking about Page’s role as Oogie Boogie in The Nightmare Before Christmas. Skull Man wouldn’t have to sing, per se, but Ken Page could still bring a unique voice to the character. I can easily imagine kids growing up watching this Mega Man adaptation and having their sense of villainy shaped by Page’s interpretation of Skull Man, like Oogie Boogie. Hopefully, Skull Man would receive more screen time, allowing Page to properly define his character. Rest in peace.
Metal Man: Robert Downey Jr.
Just lean into it. That’s the theme of my picks. Since Robert Downey Jr. is more available than he was 10 years ago, why not take the opportunity to be another metal man? This time literally Metal Man. As soon as I heard about a jerky robot in a metal suit, I picked Robert Downey Jr.. Downey Jr. has also shown interest in expanding his types of characters, as we’ve seen with his new role as Dr. Doom in Avengers: Doomsday. Yes, join Ethan Hawke on the dark side. I hear they have cookies. If they do happen to make a legitimate Mega Man film adaptation, getting Robert Downey Jr. would also be a highly marketable first step. The kids would have to see it then!
Splash Woman: Halle Bailey
Anyone who’s forced to act in a Disney live-action remake deserves a better role. Is Splash Woman that role? Splash Woman could be a better role than Ariel in a live-action Little Mermaid. Splash Woman could also be a good opportunity to set the record straight for Halle Bailey and show how talented she is when Disney isn’t putting her on a self-righteous diversity pedestal. Imagine the not-so-subtle jabs Bailey could take at Disney in the role of a robot mermaid. I’m already laughing!
Fire Man: Jason Lee
This choice is difficult to defend, even for me. After researching boss robot personalities, Jason Lee came to mind. Fire Man is more of a wannabe hero with a short temper. Does that sound like Lee’s character from The Incredibles, Buddy Pines/Syndrome? Lee has experience. Also, Jason Lee hasn’t been given many major roles in recent years. Considering (arguably) his best role was Syndrome in 2004, I’d like to see him make a comeback. Like Brendan Fraser, he has untapped potential for high-profile films. I don’t want to remember him as Dave from Alvin and the Chipmunks. Can I get some brain bleach for those movies?
Elec Man: Tom Hiddleston
Like my last choice, Tom Hiddleston as Elec Man was a fitting conclusion after some light research. And why not one more Marvel actor? Elec Man is an arrogant, overdramatic narcissist, which sounds like Loki in the MCU. While Hiddleston has experience playing these character types, he’s been branching out. I’m confident that Hiddleston would give a good performance as Elec Man. Given my layperson’s perspective, Hiddleston seems like a good fit.
Ice Man: David Bowie (Posthumously)
Ice Man was a fun role to cast. Sure, I still don’t have a solid understanding of his character, but I got the idea after Kyra discussed their pick. They had chosen Neil Patrick Harris for the role in part due to Ice Man’s flair for the theatrical. It doesn’t get more theatrical than David Bowie. That and Ice Man would’ve been a great way to reintroduce Bowie to another generation as a kids’ movie icon. They would need to let Ice Man sing. Bowie would probably write the song too, and I’d buy the vinyl. Rest in peace.
Guts Man: André the Giant (Posthumously)
Here comes another choice influenced by Kyra’s pick. Thanks, Kyra. You helped me out a lot on this one. They described Guts Man as a lumbering meat-head with a soft and gentle side. If he was still with us, I would’ve enjoyed watching André the Giant in this role. The iconic ex-wrestler had both in equal measure, and that was depicted in his personality and role choices. I fell in love with André’s personality after watching The Princess Bride. If he brought the same energy to his portrayal of Guts Man, it would’ve been great. Who knows, he could’ve been as big a star as Dwayne Johnson is today if he were still with us. Rest in peace.
Bomb Man: Dwayne Johnson
Speaking of Dwayne Johnson, he happens to be my pick for Bomb Man. Like Guts Man, Bomb Man is a larger robot intended to carry heavy loads and work primarily in construction. Based on physique alone, Johnson is a solid fit. Although, I mainly picked Johnson for Bomb Man for his personality. Bomb Man seems like a lighthearted robot with a good sense of humor, which would make Dwayne Johnson a great choice. Bomb Man and Guts Man are also supposed to be close friends, because their abilities play off each other. I wanted Dwayne Johnson to play Bomb Man since I think he and André the Giant would make great on-screen friends. I struggle to process the cuteness.
Kyra Kyle here again. That’s all we have for today’s Geekly Casting. Who would you cast in the various roles, Geekly Gang? Would you like to see a part two for any of these castings? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.
Friday Thought: Animal-based Superheroes
Top 5 Tabletop Games from 1998
Hey, hey, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here with another Top 5 Tabletop Games throughout the years. 1998 saw the continued dominance of collectible card games (CCGs). Fewer CCGs were released this year, but established ones kept board game stores afloat. 1998 had a lot of great board games, but many of them didn’t have the same staying power as previous years in this series. There may be more than one forgotten gem on today’s list. We’ll get to the games in a minute, but first, let’s look at our criteria.
1: Cultural relevance plays as much of a factor as overall quality. A game might make a list that doesn’t hold up to others of its type, but you must admit the game is everywhere.
2: Only one game from a franchise makes the list. This will become more of an issue the closer we get to games with expansions.
3: Longevity plays a role, too. A game doesn’t have to fly off the shelves today, but it had to have some widespread appeal for a decent time.
5: Kahuna (1998)
Kahuna fits the bill of a forgotten gem. This two-player game has players assume the role of ancient sorcerers of the Pacific. You compete for dominance of an archipelago consisting of twelve small islands. Players use cards to place bridges between islands and remove opponent’s bridges. If you get the majority of bridges around an island, place one of your marker stones on it and remove any of your opponent’s bridges to that island. This could, in turn, cause your opponent to lose a bridge majority on an adjacent island.
Kahuna plays in three rounds. A round ends when all cards from the face-down deck and the three face-up cards have been used. Kahuna is a fast-paced area control/majority game. It’s one of the better two-player games from this era, but Kahuna’s status as a two-player only game may have prevented it from seeing wider gameplay. Still, Kahuna was a finalist for the Spiel des Jahres (the German game of the year).
4: Elfenland (1998)
We go from a Spiel des Jahre finalist to 1998’s Spiel des Jahre winner, Elfenland. Elfenland is a redesign of the original White Wind game Elfenroads. The game is set in an elvish world. Players begin in the Elf capital, draw one face down movement tile, and are dealt eight transport cards and a secret “home” city card that they must reach at the end of the fourth round or lose points for each city space away from “home” they are at the end of the game.
Elfenland’s designer, Alan R. Moon (Ticket to Ride), has a knack for route-building games. Elfenland marks the first time Moon has made one of these lists. I may have just spoiled the game, but this won’t be the last time we’ll see Moon on one of these lists. Elfenland shares some similarities with Moon’s more popular Ticket to Ride. Elfenland is another forgotten gem.
3: Guillotine (1998)
Guillotine is yet another forgotten gem, and its theme is one of the most macabre and interesting of 1998. Players take the role of executioners during the French Revolution. In Guillotine, you’re doing your best to manipulate the execution line and score as many points, claiming the lives of nobles, clergy, and former military as you can. Off with their heads!
If you like Gallow’s humor, you’ll love Guillotine. I say this a lot, but this will not be the last Paul Peterson design to make one of these lists. Peterson has a knack for taking traditional card games in strange and exciting directions. Guillotine is bloody fun.
2: Cranium (1998)
Cranium marks the first mass market board game (a game one can find in department stores) to make one of these lists in several years. While it may have faded in popularity, Cranium took elements from various party games and formed what it claims is “the whole-brain” game. Cranium identifies four main party quiz game elements and gave them names: Creative Cat, Data Head, Word Worm, and Star Performer.
Creative Cat involves sculpting and drawing. Data Head is trivia. Word Worm has players unscrambling words, challenging them to spell a word, and guess definitions. And Star Performer includes whistling songs, impersonating a celebrity, or acting out a clue. Cranium managed to assemble as many party quiz game elements into one game as one can. In fact, I still don’t think a party quiz game has managed to include as many elements as Cranium’s into a single game design.
1: Through the Desert (1998)
Reiner Knizia takes another top spot on one of these lists with Through the Desert. Through the Desert is one of those games players remember fondly and hold in high regard. But I rarely see anyone playing Through the Desert, making it yet another forgotten gem on this list. I’d argue Cranium, despite its status as a mass market board game, is another forgotten gem. This entire list is made up of forgotten gems. Getting back to Through the Desert, it takes inspiration from the classic game of Go. Through the Desert also completes Knizia’s tile-laying trilogy of games: Tigris & Euphrates (1997), Samurai (1998), and Through the Desert (1998).
In Through the Desert, players attempt to score the most points by snaking caravan routes through the desert, trying to reach oases and blocking off sections of the desert. Two to five players control a tribe of nomads vying for control of the desert. Strategy is key in building your tribe’s caravans. There are multiple paths to gain points, but Through the Desert manages to keep its cognitive load low, meaning it’s easy to learn but difficult to master. Through the Desert is deserving of its Spiel des Jahres recommended status.
Did we get the list mostly correct? Let us know which games you’d add in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.
Game Design Brain Dump: November 21, 2025
Happy Friday, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here with another board game design brain dump. I’m taking a break from Rustbucket Riots—which I covered in last month’s brain dump–and discuss a Blackjack Deck Building game I originally made in 2018. Seven years! Yikes! Guess I got the seven-year itch. This Blackjack Deck Builder has gone through multiple minor rule modifications and name changes. The deck, based on a standard playing card deck, doesn’t have jacks and kings, so it’s had the name No Jack and No Kings.
Play Faster
My oldest daughter had a high school friend, who will remain nameless. We’ll call her C. C loved deck building games, but she wouldn’t draw her hand at the end of each turn (allowing her to plan her next turn), and every time she drew cards into her hand, she’d act like she was reading them for the first time. This frustrated my daughter and her friends. I thought of No Jack or No Kings to fix this issue.
A quick explanation of deck building card games: each player begins with the same (or at least similar) small decks and purchase cards from a supply to add to their decks, making each deck unique.
While many starter cards in a deck building game have limited text, cards one would add to their hands could contain a heap of text. This would cause C’s turns to last three minutes or more, as she read the more complicated cards that she added to her deck. So, I took out most text. Standard playing cards have little to no text. Next, C had the issue of not drawing her hand at the end of her turn. What standard card game doesn’t require a hand? Blackjack.
The above sample card (Page of Coins) is a prototype. The end product will hopefully look a lot better. Lol.
I merged deck building with Blackjack and came up with No Jack or No Kings, and it worked. With the exception of changing the suits, the only cards that look different from a deck of standard playing cards are the face cards. C knew how to play Blackjack. Players would draw cards from the top of their decks, following the standard rules for Blackjack. If you drew over 22 points of cards, you’d bust and lose your turn. If a face card remains in play (without busting) at the end of a turn, the player can move the face card to their tableau and gain its ability. In the case of the page above, every time that player draws a coin suit card, they gain one extra money to purchase other cards. No Jack/No Kings starter decks begin with one face card from one of the four suits. Each suit has a different power.
Trouble with Asymmetry
Most players in deck building games begin with the exact same cards. Choosing to go with asymmetric powers at the onset of this game, however slight, proves difficult to balance. Brushes allow players to cull cards from their discard. Deck building experts see this as overpowered. But Diamonds and Cups have better win percentages. Diamonds allow players to manipulate decks (take cards from a discard and placing them on the bottom). If you’re good at counting cards, you can induce more 21s (or Blackjacks). Cups let players discard a drawn card and draw a new one. This is also strong.
The first page I showed, the Page of Coins, is the weakest of all four. But perception matters. Even though I’ve playtested No Jack/No Kings hundreds of times and found Cups and Diamonds win more often than not, players still “feel” more powerful with Brushes and, to a lesser extent, Coins. Granted, one of my playtest weekends was with someone at a Protospiel. He played No Jack/No Kings throughout the entire weekend (like a few dozen times), hoping to sculpt a deck of only Tens and Aces. This gamer played Brushes in each game and lost every time. Winning didn’t factor into his enjoyment. He wanted to build a near-perfect deck. So, the numbers may be a little skewed.
Does anything need to be changed? Honestly, I don’t know.
How to Win at No Jack/No Kings
I just realized we discussed No Jack/No Kings mechanisms without sharing how to win. There’s a separate deck of Patrons. Every patron can be claimed with a Blackjack (21), but each patron also gives discounts to two suits. If you have a face card from either suit in your tableau and you reach the lower number, you can claim the patron. Every turn, you can either claim a patron or purchase cards from the supply. That’s how the gamer (Protospiel) lost so many times. He would purchase cards if they fit in his “perfect deck” instead of claiming a patron. The first player to claim six patrons wins.
No Theme and Simple Mechanisms
I don’t know why I shelved No Jack/No Kings for almost a decade. My best guess is that I wanted No Jack/No Kings to have more theme or more complexity. I no longer care if No Jack/No Kings has a theme, and any additional mechanisms I added to the game diluted the core gameplay. I was obsessed with everything No Jack/No Kings didn’t have and failed to see what it did have. That same Protospiel (seven years ago, I’m guessing), I only taught the game once. Other gamers taught No Jack/No Kings to the rest of the convention, and the game was played consistently for two and a half days. I need to get out of my own way. Ugh!
I’m finalizing the starter decks and the cost of cards. But there are shockingly few things to balance/tweak after I pin down the starter decks, so I’m left with one question. Which name do you like better, No Jack or No Kings?
Let me know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.
Color Palette: Mega Man 01
Whatcha Watching, Geekly: November 2025
Happy Wednesday, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here. Today, our writers share what they’ve been watching over the past month. You’re welcome to join the fun and share what you’ve been watching, Geekly Gang. I’ll get us started with the movies I watched.
Kyra’s Movies
All our geekly writers watched the two movies I’ll be discussing. I’d like to see what Season and Skye have to say about each of these films.
In short, Weapons had too many point-of-view (POV) characters. If you’re like me and you thought Weapons started strong, dragged in the middle, and found its footing at the end, that’s because the movie had too many POVs. The teacher made the best choice as the first POV. Good job there. The audience needed at least one parent’s POV. Great choice to include one, but I question this POV’s placement in the movie’s sequence. I didn’t like how the parent immediately followed the teacher. Director Cregger didn’t trust his audience to remember someone painting “Witch” on the side of the teacher’s car. This will be an ongoing issue.
Then, we get a few POVs we didn’t need. The cop adds nothing. The junkie actively made the story worse. How cool would it have been if the first time the audience saw the kids in the basement was when the father found them? Instead, a random junkie undercuts that potential emotional weight. And the principal’s POV is repetitive. And what was with making the principal gay? This inclusion reeks of tokenism. Within ten minutes of learning the principal is gay (which we only learn because we’re in his POV), the principal kills his husband. Hollywood needs to uphold the tired trope of Bury Your Gays.
Weapons gets back on track with the kid’s POV, and then it’s relatively smooth sailing–from a story perspective. Weapons is a good movie, but it’s overhyped. It doesn’t deserve a 93% fresh rating. Limiting Weapons to three POVs (the teacher, the kid, and the father, and in that order) and bouncing between the three would’ve given Weapons a chance to dig deeper into these characters. Weapons is praised as a “smart film,” but it treats its audience like imbeciles. Writer/Director Zach Cregger doesn’t trust his audience to piece together things, which is why the movie spells out everything in the principal’s POV, even when all the information delivered in the principal’s POV can be obtained through the other POVs. We’re left with puddle-depth characters and inconsistent world-building.
Oh, and what was with dropping the machine gun references and imagery outside of the teacher and father’s POV after the beginning? Again, if we only got three POVs (specifically, the three I mentioned), the idea that Weapons is a metaphor for school shootings would’ve been clearer.
Objectively, Weapons is a better movie than The Monkey, but I had a lot more fun watching The Monkey. Even though it’s a horror comedy, The Monkey does a better job setting up stakes for its characters (we actually have a ticking clock of the father losing visitation rights with his son after the weekend) and building emotional resonance than Weapons. So, maybe The Monkey is the better film.
Make no mistake. The Monkey is ridiculous. Its acting is over-the-top but in the best possible ways. I laughed out loud during Elijah Wood’s scene; he’s a treasure. Some of the lines and character choices are jarring, but in a deliberate, self-aware manner. I loved watching the Final Destination-like deaths occur, preceded by the titular wind-up monkey drumming its tune. I especially like the bus filled with cheerleaders at the movie’s end. I won’t say any more, but it’s hilarious. And the nods to other Stephen King stories were fun.
The Monkey doesn’t have a lot to say, but doesn’t need to have a greater message. Sometimes you just want–or need–a good laugh.
Kyra’s Show
I’m back to watching true crime. While writing this post, I’m eagerly awaiting the final episode of Hulu’s Murdaugh: Death in the Family. I first learned about the Murdaughs when Netflix released its documentary series years ago, so I was somewhat familiar with what to expect. But Hulu’s docudrama Murdaugh: Death in the Family lives up to the craziness surrounding this case.
I forgot a lot of the specifics for the Murdaugh Murders. I’m fighting the urge to rewatch the Netflix documentary before finishing Murdaugh: Death in the Family. Going in blind must be a treat. I don’t want to spoil anything, but the Murdaugh Murders are perfect fodder for true crime series, movies, and much more. There are so many elements to this story. Money laundering. Drug abuse. Infidelity. Wire fraud. Witness tampering. Wrongful deaths–plural. And this all happens before Mags and Paul Murdaugh are slain. The suspect pool for the Murdaugh Murders is limited to the entire state of South Carolina. Who wouldn’t be a suspect?
At least, that’s what I would’ve thought if I hadn’t watched the other content before watching Murdaugh: Death in the Family. If you haven’t seen anything else about the Murdaughs, refrain from doing so until after watching this series. The acting is on point.
That’s all I have for this month. What’ve you been watching, Season?
Season’s Movie
I’m going to be honest. I didn’t watch much this past month. I’ve been busy and haven’t had time to sit down and watch something. However, I do like to have something playing in the background while I fall asleep. For that, A Goofy Movie is perfect.
I’ve been feeling nostalgic, and I remember owning A Goofy Movie on VHS. I watched it so much, my mom eventually hid it. I remember jamming out to Tevin Campbell’s music (“I2I” and “Stand Out”), which was the main reason I watched A Goofy Movie. This time, I focused on the parent-child relationship. It holds up, even after removing nostalgia glasses. A Goofy Movie is a good watch for all ages.
What are you watching, Skye?
Skye’s Movie
The Monkey was my introduction to director Osgood Perkins. I’m not dissatisfied. Kyra came to me on Halloween and told me about this ridiculous horror comedy that had to be seen to be believed. Funny thing: I’ve seen it, but I’m still not sure I believe it. Did I enjoy The Monkey? Without a doubt, yes. The Monkey was the most insane horror comedy I’ve seen in recent years, which kept me laughing even when the screen was covered in gore. Yeah, this movie loves its body parts. Everything is just the right amount of wrong, and the fact it all revolves around a monkey doll turns the absurdity up to 11. I highly recommend The Monkey, just not too soon after mealtime.
Skye’s Show
Um, sure. Since I watched Monster: Ed Gein last month, Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer felt like the next logical step. Technically, Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer is better than Monster: Ed Gein, but that’s a low bar. Simply put, it’s obvious why people call Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer insensitive. It’s dead set on violating the stories of real-life murder victims, and some episodes were downright infuriating. True crime has always fascinated me, but there’s a right and a wrong way to do it. Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer is definitely the wrong way. If you’re curious about these true stories, it’s better to watch documentaries or read dissertations about them. Don’t be Ryan Murphy.
Kyra Kyle again. It looks like Skye enjoyed The Monkey. Yay! Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.
X-Women Timeline
jkgeekly.com 