Geekly Casting: Mega Man Film

Happy Monday, Geekly Gang! We’re bringing back the Geekly Casting series, and today’s subject is a live-action Mega Man film. There were talks about a Netflix Mega Man film, but we haven’t heard much about this project since late 2021. A lot has changed since then. Mega Man even had an episode in Amazon Prime’s Secret Level series, a television series based on random video games. But the Blue Bomber deserves a big screen adaptation. Kyra Kyle here. As usual, I’ll start this post and share modern actors who could play the various roles, and Skye, our movie geek, will search Hollywood’s past and present for the best possible actors to play each role.

Our first order of business is figuring out which characters we need to cast. We’ll keep Rock’s supporting cast short: Dr. Light, Roll, and maybe another character or two. We won’t bother casting Rush. He’ll be a robo-dog, so they’ll record random dog noises. Dr. Wily’s an obvious inclusion. We’ll skip casting Yellow Devil; he’ll mostly grunt. The Robot Masters pose a difficult challenge. Skull Man must make the cast because he was a main antagonist in Mega Man’s manga, but the other Robot Masters should have a balanced power set and come from popular games in the Mega Man series. This is a tall order. We’ll do our best.

Mega Man/Rock: Cameron Crovetti

I considered several actors to play the title role in Mega Man. Malachi Barton’s range intrigued me. I could even see an unknown take on the role, but I landed on Cameron Crovetti.

Crovetti is best known for his role on the Amazon Prime series The Boys. He portrays Homelander’s son, so Crovetti has experience with characters with questionable backgrounds. While Mega Man doesn’t go as dark as The Boys, Rock has a conflicted relationship with humanity. Crovetti has several comedic roles under his belt, too, so he has range. I could see him portray the Blue Bomber.

Honestly, the Crovetti family could sport more than one role in Mega Man. Cameron’s twin brother, Nicholas, portrayed Max Wright in Big Little Lies. If Mega Man included Copy Robot, and the production company wanted to avoid using CGI to make Copy Robot look eerily similar to Mega Man, Nicholas Crovetti makes sense. The Crovetti brothers have an older sister, Isabella, who could portray Roll. Roll and Rock (Mega Man) are considered siblings in the Mega Man universe, so it makes sense for Isabella Crovetti to play Roll, but let’s go with a different actor.

Roll: Lulu Wilson

Lulu Wilson is best known for horror films and television series like Ouija: Origin of Evil, Annabelle: Creation, The Haunting of Hill House, and Fall of the House of Usher. Wilson even portrayed a young Gloria Steinem in The Glorias. Despite a short career, she has an impressive filmography. Wilson also has a handful of comedic roles under her belt, specifically the dark comedy Wyrm. So, Wilson has the range to pull off Rock’s older sister Roll.

Typically, Roll comes off as compassionate and patient, but Mega Man 11, the most recent entry in the mainline Mega Man series, shows her giving Auto (another Mega Man side character who could make an appearance) a hard time. Let’s face it. Roll can be brutal toward Auto in Mega Man 11. Roll also doesn’t mind joining Rock (Mega Man) in battle. Lulu Wilson could pull off a Roll who looks overtly demure, but has a hidden edge, begging to be set free.

Dr. Thomas Light: Pierce Brosnan

Honestly, I could’ve gone with the Mega Man fan consensus and picked Jeff Bridges. Bridges has been the lovable bearded man for decades; he would make a great Dr. Light. Instead, I’m going with Pierce Brosnan. Mega Man depicts Dr. Light as a kind-hearted father figure and little else. After all, Light created Rock, Roll, and X. Brosnan has portrayed father figures in the past, but he may bring another layer to the character that a generic fatherly actor wouldn’t. Don’t ask me what that layer is. That’s up to Brosnan to pull deep from his acting experience.

Dr. Albert Wily: Willem Dafoe

Willem Dafoe as Dr. Albert Wily may be typecasting. Who cares? I went off-center with Brosnan as Dr. Light; Dafoe is at his best when his character has a tenuous grasp on reality. Whoever portrays Dr. Wily needs a disconnect with reality. Only a madman would put the world at risk by turning robots (who were minding their own business) against humanity. Dafoe could easily pull off an unhinged Dr. Wily.

Skull Man: Javier Bardem

We’ve reached the Robot Masters. Woo hoo! Whoever fills these roles won’t need to match the look of their counterpart. The Robot Masters will predominantly be CGI.

We begin with Skull Man. Unlike most Robot Masters, Skull Man was designed specifically for combat. Dr. Wily built Skull Man to take down Mega Man. While other Robot Masters have personalities outside of “must destroy Mega Man” (other Robot Masters are coerced or brainwashed), Skull Man is a killer who will stop at nothing to end Mega Man. Again, this may be typecasting, but Javier Bardem has been that level of cold-blooded killer.

Skull Man shows little emotion. He struggles to make a connection with any of the other Robot Masters. He has a hollow, inhuman affect. Like many other actors on this list, Bardem would give Skull Man an extra layer of character.

Metal Man: Peter Dinklage

Even when he isn’t brainwashed, Metal Man is a jerk. Sarcasm is Metal Man’s first language. He treats the other Robot Masters like buffoons, cracking jokes at their expense. To be fair, few of the other Robot Masters figure out they’re the butt of Metal Man’s joke. Yep. Peter Dinklage could easily pull off an affable, wisecracking Metal Man. Dinklage could find the perfect blend of fun and danger. Couldn’t you see Dinklage tossing saw blades like they’re Frisbees?

Splash Woman: Kristen Bell

Splash Woman first appeared in the Mega Man comic book. She began as a hero. The Mega Man comic built up Splash Woman’s stakes ahead of Mega Man 9, so when she gets brainwashed in the game, players would care. Splash Woman is Mega Man’s karaoke-loving bestie. She may have been constructed for underwater repairs, but musical theater is Splash Woman’s passion. Kristen Bell has the musical training and comedic timing to pull off Splash Woman. Bell’s Splash Woman could be a villain in the first Mega Man film, or she could be converted in the sequel. Hmm.

Fire Man: Nikolaj Coster-Waldau

Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Peter Dinklage could have a mini Game of Thrones reunion. That would be fun. It would also be fun to watch Coster-Waldau take on Fire Man, a Robot Master who believes he’s the hero. That’s right. Fire Man suffers from main character syndrome. Game of Thrones had several “main characters,” so Coster-Waldau as Fire Man works on a meta storytelling level. I can see Mega Man jokingly follow Fire Man as the main character for a scene. I can also see Nikolaj Coster-Waldau playing a hot-headed–a little on the nose–Fire Man.

Elec Man: Joaquin Phoenix

Were some of these Robot Masters brainwashed, or were they nudged? Conceited and egotistical, Elec Man walks a tightrope between kindhearted and sadistic freak. Joaquin Phoenix has portrayed his fair share of characters like Elec Man. I can hear Phoenix pull off a line like, “To watch my beautiful bolts fly to the top of your head. To hear your delightful shrieks.” Woah! Elec Man may have some issues.

Ice Man: Neil Patrick Harris

Ice Man loves to show off for the crowd. The world’s a stage, and he’ll give Splash Woman a run for her money as Mega Man’s best singer. Neil Patrick Harris has a flair for the dramatic. I’ve heard he’s a good singer, too. Wink. Harris’s Ice Man and the actor who I have playing Bomb Man could have more than one musical number. One of them needs to be a Mega Man variant of “Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better.” Make it happen.

Guts Man: Terry Crews

Built for construction, Guts Man takes his job seriously. While he may perform physical labor, Guts Man is smarter than he looks. He can be over-dramatic with a penchant for sudden outbursts, but Guts Man cares deeply for his coworkers. Underneath his bulky exterior, Guts Man’s a big softy, just like my pick to portray him, Terry Crews. Sure, I want to see Crews in more films. But you read Guts Man’s description. Tell me that doesn’t scream Terry Crews.

Bomb Man: Wayne Brady

Bomb Man is another Robot Master with a flair for the dramatic. While he doesn’t necessarily sing in the Mega Man series, who says he can’t in the movie? I have mixed feelings about How I Met Your Mother, but Wayne Brady and Neil Patrick Harris would be another fun reunion. Brady and Harris’s chemistry is undeniable, and I’d love to see how Bomb Man and Ice Man would interact with each other. They’re too similar, fighting for the same spotlight. Anything you can freeze, I can explode!

That’s the cast I have for Mega Man. Let’s check in with our film geek, Skye.

Skye’s Picks

I’m not well-versed in the Mega Man game series. I’ve beaten the first one and gotten halfway through the second, so my knowledge of the lore and characters is limited. Because of that, all my picks for this post were actors who made me giggle. My version of Mega Man is more kid-friendly and goofy. I hope these picks aren’t blasphemous. Either way, enjoy my picks for a Mega Man feature film adaptation.

Mega Man/Rock: Mark Hamill (Young)

Let’s see, someone who’s fresh-faced, eager to explore, lovable in his ignorance with just the right amount of whininess sprinkled in. I couldn’t help but imagine young Mark Hamill playing Mega Man. I’m unsure if that’s the best representation of Mega Man’s character (please refer to my intro), but it’s at least compelling. If nothing else, we know Hamill started his career playing that exact archetype. Seeing him learn and upgrade himself as he “cuts” (hehe) through the various bosses would be believable. With the tutelage of Obi-Wan–I mean Dr. Light–young Hamill could easily become another iconic sci-fi protagonist.

Roll: Dakota Fanning (Younger)

Roll was tricky for me to cast, but I remembered I had cast Fanning’s sister in a previous casting call (Geekly Casting: X-Men in the MCU). Since I prefer not to repeat actors I’ve already cast, why not Dakota? Like her younger sister, Elle, Dakota Fanning has had a storied acting career. I could see her pulling off Roll’s kind-hearted and bubbly personality. Since I cast young Mark Hamill as Mega Man/Rock, I thought it would make more sense to cast Fanning in her 20s. Rock n’ Roll are meant to be siblings, so it’d be a bit weird if they weren’t close in age. She’s got the look, style, and personality, so let’s give her the Roll. See what I did there?

Dr. Thomas Light: Patrick Stewart

I shouldn’t have to explain this one. Come on, it’s Patrick Stewart. Patrick Stewart is one of the go-to actors for good-natured, smart old dudes. Dr. Light would be no exception. Stewart has unrivaled on-screen charisma, a decades-long career under his belt, and the ability to make any movie he’s in better. Stewart works as Dr. Light. I won’t even bother naming them all, y’all already know. The only issue is his distinct lack of hair, but it’s Hollywood. They can figure out something.

Dr. Albert Wily: Ian McKellen

After casting Patrick Stewart as Dr. Light, it only felt right to go with Ian McKellen as Dr. Wily. If you’re a member of the Geekly Gang, you probably know why I made this choice. Not only are Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen two peas in a pod, but they work off each other in ways unlike any other acting duo in Hollywood. They’ve had several roles and done countless productions together, but the rivalry between Light and Wily is mostly why I went with McKellen. Given their past playing Professor X and Magneto, Stewart and McKellen would foil each other perfectly for the Light/Wily rivalry. Now, I badly want to watch this Mega Man movie. Make it so, Hollywood!

Skull Man: Ken Page (Posthumously)

If we’re going the kid-friendly and goofy route, Ken Page as Skull Man makes a marketable, mildly intimidating, and memorable choice. I admit it. I was thinking about Page’s role as Oogie Boogie in The Nightmare Before Christmas. Skull Man wouldn’t have to sing, per se, but Ken Page could still bring a unique voice to the character. I can easily imagine kids growing up watching this Mega Man adaptation and having their sense of villainy shaped by Page’s interpretation of Skull Man, like Oogie Boogie. Hopefully, Skull Man would receive more screen time, allowing Page to properly define his character. Rest in peace.

Metal Man: Robert Downey Jr.

Just lean into it. That’s the theme of my picks. Since Robert Downey Jr. is more available than he was 10 years ago, why not take the opportunity to be another metal man? This time literally Metal Man. As soon as I heard about a jerky robot in a metal suit, I picked Robert Downey Jr.. Downey Jr. has also shown interest in expanding his types of characters, as we’ve seen with his new role as Dr. Doom in Avengers: Doomsday. Yes, join Ethan Hawke on the dark side. I hear they have cookies. If they do happen to make a legitimate Mega Man film adaptation, getting Robert Downey Jr. would also be a highly marketable first step. The kids would have to see it then!

Splash Woman: Halle Bailey

Anyone who’s forced to act in a Disney live-action remake deserves a better role. Is Splash Woman that role? Splash Woman could be a better role than Ariel in a live-action Little Mermaid. Splash Woman could also be a good opportunity to set the record straight for Halle Bailey and show how talented she is when Disney isn’t putting her on a self-righteous diversity pedestal. Imagine the not-so-subtle jabs Bailey could take at Disney in the role of a robot mermaid. I’m already laughing!

Fire Man: Jason Lee

This choice is difficult to defend, even for me. After researching boss robot personalities, Jason Lee came to mind. Fire Man is more of a wannabe hero with a short temper. Does that sound like Lee’s character from The Incredibles, Buddy Pines/Syndrome? Lee has experience. Also, Jason Lee hasn’t been given many major roles in recent years. Considering (arguably) his best role was Syndrome in 2004, I’d like to see him make a comeback. Like Brendan Fraser, he has untapped potential for high-profile films. I don’t want to remember him as Dave from Alvin and the Chipmunks. Can I get some brain bleach for those movies?

Elec Man: Tom Hiddleston

Like my last choice, Tom Hiddleston as Elec Man was a fitting conclusion after some light research. And why not one more Marvel actor? Elec Man is an arrogant, overdramatic narcissist, which sounds like Loki in the MCU. While Hiddleston has experience playing these character types, he’s been branching out. I’m confident that Hiddleston would give a good performance as Elec Man. Given my layperson’s perspective, Hiddleston seems like a good fit.

Ice Man: David Bowie (Posthumously)

Ice Man was a fun role to cast. Sure, I still don’t have a solid understanding of his character, but I got the idea after Kyra discussed their pick. They had chosen Neil Patrick Harris for the role in part due to Ice Man’s flair for the theatrical. It doesn’t get more theatrical than David Bowie. That and Ice Man would’ve been a great way to reintroduce Bowie to another generation as a kids’ movie icon. They would need to let Ice Man sing. Bowie would probably write the song too, and I’d buy the vinyl. Rest in peace.

Guts Man: André the Giant (Posthumously)

Here comes another choice influenced by Kyra’s pick. Thanks, Kyra. You helped me out a lot on this one. They described Guts Man as a lumbering meat-head with a soft and gentle side. If he was still with us, I would’ve enjoyed watching André the Giant in this role. The iconic ex-wrestler had both in equal measure, and that was depicted in his personality and role choices. I fell in love with André’s personality after watching The Princess Bride. If he brought the same energy to his portrayal of Guts Man, it would’ve been great. Who knows, he could’ve been as big a star as Dwayne Johnson is today if he were still with us. Rest in peace.

Bomb Man: Dwayne Johnson

Speaking of Dwayne Johnson, he happens to be my pick for Bomb Man. Like Guts Man, Bomb Man is a larger robot intended to carry heavy loads and work primarily in construction. Based on physique alone, Johnson is a solid fit. Although, I mainly picked Johnson for Bomb Man for his personality. Bomb Man seems like a lighthearted robot with a good sense of humor, which would make Dwayne Johnson a great choice. Bomb Man and Guts Man are also supposed to be close friends, because their abilities play off each other. I wanted Dwayne Johnson to play Bomb Man since I think he and André the Giant would make great on-screen friends. I struggle to process the cuteness.

Kyra Kyle here again. That’s all we have for today’s Geekly Casting. Who would you cast in the various roles, Geekly Gang? Would you like to see a part two for any of these castings? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Skye’s Halloween Favorite Movies

Hooray! It’s that day again. Happy Halloween! To honor Spooky Season, I’d like to discuss my favorite movies to watch for Halloween. We all have our go-tos for holiday movies. What are some of your favorite Halloween movies? You may find some of your favorites among my list. With all that said, let me walk you through my favorite Halloween movies.

5) Coraline (2009)

While Coraline doesn’t take place during Spooky Season, the themes and tone are a perfect fit. This’ll be a common thread among many of my picks. I first saw Coraline as a kid with my family soon after it was released, and I didn’t fully understand it. In fact, my main takeaway was “Huh…that was weird.” Despite being a chronically terrified child (so much so, I couldn’t bear to look at horror movie DVD covers), Coraline didn’t scare me. Now that I’m older–and a very weird person–Coraline is one of my ideal Halloween movies. Given my love of stop-motion animation and the freakish imagery its creepy movement creates, Coraline remains a solid Spooky Season film.

4) Beetlejuice (1988)

I’m glad I didn’t have Beetlejuice growing up. Considering how impressionable I was as a kid and the adult content it contains, Beetlejuice would’ve rubbed off on me in all the wrong ways. I first watched it 3 years ago when I was feeling desperate to find a new classic Halloween film. As you can see, I found one. Beetlejuice scratched all the right itches, and now, I’m happy to say it’s joined the list of movies I watch during Halloween. Beetlejuice is a beautiful blend of contradictions. It doesn’t always make sense, but I forgive it since that’s part of the joke. While Beetlejuice is funny, it can also be dramatic, heartfelt, and creepy. Some of the effects are outstanding while others are laughably terrible, and I’d expect nothing less from Tim Burton.

3) The Thing (1982)

I love monster movies. Just check out my Halloween movie post from last year. I’m also a die-hard practical effects lover. Enter The Thing. The Thing is one of the quintessential monster films for any monster fan. It gives us outstanding scenes of ooey-gooey transformations, while not boring us with slow moments. Like other classic sci-fi monster flicks (like Alien), it’s the slow, quiet moments that add to the scare factor. The Thing is, first and foremost, a survival film. Each of the men at the Antarctic research base is well-qualified and competent, unlike several other horror film protagonists. You want to see them make it out alive. Unfortunately, they’re dealing with something that’s way beyond their understanding.

2) Trick ‘r Treat (1986)

Trick ‘r’ Treat is a favorite of mine, given how much it’s covered in Halloween. It has a lot of personality, but I enjoy how it respects Halloween. Despite being an adult film, Trick ‘r’ Treat manages to speak to my inner child with its aesthetic and emphasis on classic Halloween traditions. While watching Trick ‘r’ Treat, I can’t help but look back on the years I walked door-to-door in a costume and getting wasted on candy. Ah, those were the days. Also, the protagonist, Sam, reflects my attitude towards folks who don’t enjoy Halloween. You’d better watch out.

1) The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

Could any other movie claim the top spot? The Nightmare Before Christmas has long been my #1 Halloween movie. In fact, it’s the movie I always watch on Halloween itself. While I was lukewarm towards Nightmare Before Christmas as a kid, as I’ve gotten older, I absolutely love it. Nightmare Before Christmas was the movie that got me interested in the art of stop-motion and fascinated me with its fantastic yet relatable story and characters. By now, I’ve seen this movie so many times that I can practically recite it from memory. Sometimes I feel like Jack and am desperate to find a new Halloween movie to add to my Spooky Season tradition (like I mentioned earlier with Beetlejuice). But I’ll never stop watching The Nightmare Before Christmas around Halloween. It was and remains my #1 Spooky Season movie.

Those are my picks for Halloween movies. I hope you had as much fun as I did on this road of spooks, nostalgia, and holiday cheer. What are your favorite movies to watch around Spooky Season? I can’t wait to hear from y’all in the comments, and I hope you have a fabulous Halloween.

Top 5 Slasher Film Villains

It’s Monday the 13th. OoooOOoooo! Happy Spooky Season, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here. We’re continuing our Halloween coverage with slash films. Grease your chainsaws. Sharpen your machetes. It’s time to discuss the five best slasher film villains of all time. All time!

5) Art the Clown (Terrifier Franchise)

Art the Clown is a demented killer clown mime who kills people on Halloween nights. He carries a multitude of crude weapons and mutilates his victims in gruesome ways. Art the Clown’s manner of killing–which includes lots of kills and gore–cause his movies to verge on torture porn (popularized by the Saw franchise), but the Terrifier films maintain their slasher film status because of Art the Clown at their center.

Art the Clown has appeared in three movies and two shorts, and in a short time span, he’s become a horror icon. He’s easily the best slasher villain of the past decade. Given enough time, Art the Clown could climb this list, but I’m not so sure. The names above him are horror mainstays. Still, Art the Clown and the movies that feature him are more hardcore than most slasher killers throughout the years. He causes a glorious mess with every kill.

4) Candyman (Candyman Franchise)

Candyman, or Daniel Robitaille, is as much an urban legend or myth as he is a slasher villain. This is only one way he stands out. He’s tragic backstory goes beyond slasher movie tropes. Rooted in themes of racial violence and injustice, Candyman’s origin adds a layer of empathy, making his vengeful actions terrifying and, in an odd way, justified. His phrase, “Be my victim,” adds to the sense of dread and serves as a reminder of buried societal traumas.

The Candyman series had me scared to say his name five times. The first Candyman film remains the best. Tony Todd (rest in peace) gave Candyman a sense of purpose and grace that separated him from any slasher villain of his era. The second film went deeper into Candyman’s lore, while the fourth movie, produced by Jordan Peele, brought back the iconic killer while honoring the Black culture within the story. I love the Candyman series. Its villain just misses out on our top three, but the top three are horror movie royalty.

3) Freddy Krueger (A Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise)

Freddy Krueger’s ability to invade dreams sets him apart from other slasher movie villains. He transforms the safe haven of sleep into a terrifying killing ground. With his burned face, razor-sharp blades, and sinister laugh, Freddy taps into primal fears. He is the boogie man under the bed, in the bed, above the bed, hiding in the closet, and so much more. But Freddy isn’t all horror. He adds enough dark humor and charisma to make him repulsive and magnetic.

There’s no escape from Freddy. He follows victims into their most vulnerable state. Created by Wes Craven, Freddy Krueger will haunt the audience’s dreams long after his movies end. I’m haunted by the children’s song that serves as Freddy’s preamble. One, two, Freddy’s coming for you. Three, four, better lock your door. Five, six, grab your crucifix. Seven, Eight, gonna stay up late. Nine, ten, never sleep again. Try singing that right before you go to bed. You may just stay up an extra hour or two or five.

2) Jason Voorhees (Friday the 13th Franchise)

At the end of the first Friday the 13th movie, and after his mother died, Jason rose from the depths of Camp Crystal Lake to become the franchise’s new villain. He machetes his way through the camp and into the audience’s hearts with his bloody kills. Jason is a killing artist. He became more flamboyant through the years. He’s been killed and reanimated more times than a comic book hero, which actually matches his demeanor of an unstoppable zombie-like killer.

Interestingly, Jason is the more sympathetic character in his big crossover movie with Freddy Krueger, despite Jason being an unfeeling killing machine in his solo movies. Few slasher villains are more prolific than Jason. We can only think of one other slasher villain who tops his kill count and takes the number one spot as the true face of evil.

1) Michael Myers (Halloween Franchise)

Black Christmas may have come first, but Halloween’s Michael Myers is the first name and face people think of when they think of a slasher villain. There’s something about a bleached William Shatner mask. Michael Myers completes the slasher villain big three of Michael, Jason, and Freddy. Michael Myers doesn’t claim our haunting number one spot because he’s physically imposing. He’s the shape of evil. He’s the one who began killing when he was a child and never stopped.

John Carpenter’s 1978 Halloween didn’t create the slasher subgenre. The genre bloomed in the wake of Michael Myers’ butcher knife. This horrifying classic had a simple premise. A silent serial killer stalks a quiet town. After decades of movies (and more on the way, we’re sure), Michael Myers petrifies audiences. Michael’s theme music is the stuff of legend. As soon as I wrote this post’s title, it played in my head. Not going to lie, I played the song. Pure movie magic.

That’s our list of the top five slasher film villains. Did we get the list right? Who would you add or take away? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, we hope you’re having a great day.

Marvel One-Shots Ranked

Hey, hey, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here. The MCU has a history of making short films (One-Shots) that would tie into feature-length films. These One-Shots differ from Marvel Specials like Werewolf By Night. Typically, One-Shots last between five and fifteen minutes, so one could watch all the Marvel One-Shots in the time it would take to watch Werewolf By Night. Originally airing from 2011-2014, Marvel One-Shots were included as bonus features on MCU Blu-ray and DVDs. A couple of these One-Shots would inspire television shows. Geekly has never ranked MCU One-Shots. Let’s change that.

6-8) Team Thor Parts One & Two and Team Darryl (2016-2017)

There’s some debate as to whether Team Thor Parts One and Two and Team Darryl qualify as Marvel One-Shots. All three shorts were released after 2014, two years after the MCU officially said Marvel One-Shots aired, so I’m guessing they don’t count, which works for me. All three of these One-Shots are five-minute comedy routines with Thor or the Grandmaster adapting to life on Earth with a human named Darryl. People’s mileage with these jokes may vary, but all three are okay at best and groan worthy at worst.

I prefer the first one (Team Thor Part One) because it came first, and all three shorts use the same type of jokes, so they get progressively less funny. Should we call these three One-Shots honorable mentions?

5) The Consultant (September 13, 2011)

The Consultant is a strong Marvel One-Shot. While seated at a diner, Agents Coulson and Sitwell discuss how they intend to prevent General Ross from freeing his friend, Emil Blonsky (The Abomination from The Incredible Hulk). Sitwell suggests that he could be a patsy and sabotage General Ross’s plot to free Blonsky, and then Coulson counters by sending in someone to irritate Ross so much that he’ll flub the assignment. Sitwell suggests the titular “Consultant” (or Tony Stark), and eventually, Ross and Stark share an uncomfortable exchange. Mission accomplished.

Interesting tidbit: Coulson and Sitwell subtly hint at a future MCU plot point. When Coulson first talks about “the mission,” he doesn’t reveal everything he knows about the situation. Sitwell states he has Level Six Clearance and that there is no such thing as Level Seven Clearance. When Coulson returns after the events of The Avengers and sets up the Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. television series, he reveals that he’s alive again and says, “Welcome to Level Seven Clearance.”

4) A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer (October 25, 2011)

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer edges out The Consultant because it uses straightforward storytelling. Set before the events of Thor, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer begins with Agent Coulson stopping for gas. A stick-up takes place, and Agent Coulson defuses the situation. Actually, he turns into full-on John Wick and knocks out the armed robbers. Afterwards, he pays for his snacks and advises the store clerk not to tell the police he was there. A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Thor’s Hammer shows Agent Coulson in a different light. He’s more than a pencil pusher at S.H.I.E.L.D., and this sequence was a sign of things to come.

3) All Hail The King (February 4, 2014)

Before making this list, I thought All Hail The King would land at number one, but there are two other Marvel One-Shots that edge out this much-needed retcon for Iron Man’s nemesis, The Mandarin. Ben Kingsley reprises his role as Trevor Slattery. Because of his role in Iron Man 3, Slattery is locked up in Seagate Prison. But it turns out that Slattery has a fan club and a butler named Herman, so Trevor isn’t exactly doing hard time.

Documentary filmmaker Jackson Norriss chronicles Slattery’s life, but he’s not all he appears to be. During his interview, Norriss takes out a hidden gun (from his camera), shoots all the guards, and Slattery’s butler. In classic Slattery fashion, he begs Norriss not to kill him. Norriss reveals that he’s breaking Slattery out of prison. The one whose name Slattery stole (the Mandarin) will have the honor of killing the cheesy actor.

I like that All Hail The King improves the Mandarin’s origin from Iron Man 3. All Hail The King has more than one call-back from the Iron Man franchise. During a mid-credits scene, Justin Hammer scoffs at Slattery’s performance in the prison cafeteria. Hammer wonders what makes Slattery so special. What indeed, Hammer. What indeed.

2) Item 47 (September 25, 2012)

Item 47 centers on a couple just scraping by, Bennie and Claire, who find a functional Chitauri gun. Using the alien technology, the pair go on a bank-robbing spree until Agent Sitwell of S.H.I.E.L.D. tracks them down. Instead of pressing charges, Sitwell recruits the pair into S.H.I.E.L.D. Item 47 features another straightforward plot, but where this One-Shot shines is its character development. You get a sense of who Bennie and Claire are and a seldom-seen glimpse at what “normal people” experience in a world dominated by superheroes and supervillains.

Item 47’s story arc laid the foundation for the Vulture in Spider-Man: Homecoming, and it indirectly began the television series Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.. I knew Item 47 would rank high on this list. I had forgotten how influential Item 47 was to the MCU. It may take the top spot for most influential Marvel One-Shot, but one short just narrowly beats it for number one.

1) Agent Carter (September 3, 2013)

Hayley Atwell reprises her role as Peggy Carter (Steve Rogers’ love interest in the original Captain America) in Agent Carter. This is another Marvel One-Shot that started a television show, this time of the same name. To be fair, Marvel had intended to produce an Agent Carter television show. The Agent Carter One-Shot’s popularity sealed the deal.

I’ll be honest. I forgot the Agent Carter One-Shot existed. It does a great job of showing Peggy Carter navigating the loss of Steve Rogers and a hostile work environment filled with misogynists. S.H.I.E.L.D.’s early days were no picnic for a woman secret agent. Peggy single-handedly takes on an important, time-sensitive mission that S.H.I.E.L.D. believes is a 3-5 agent job. At first, the job seems routine, but things take a turn for the worse when she encounters Zodiac.

By Agent Carter’s end, Peggy is one of the few running S.H.I.E.L.D. with Howard Stark. Agent Carter features over-the-top action and campy set designs. It reminds me of a comic strip from the 1940s or 50s. It claims our top spot because it allows Peggy Carter to escape Captain America’s shadow. And it’s fun.

So, that’s our list. How would you rank the Marvel One-Shots? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Geekly Casting: Legend of Zelda

Hey, hey, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here. Today marks the third Geekly Casting post we’ve made with the new format, and the movie we’re casting today is the upcoming live-action Legend of Zelda movie. We almost have another two years before this movie releases in theaters, but that doesn’t mean we can’t speculate who should play each role. As usual, I’ll kick off this post with modern actors, and then Skye will step in with some historical actors for a dream casting. Feel free to share who you think should portray the characters in the upcoming live-action Legend of Zelda movie.

The Legend of Zelda doesn’t have as many recurring characters as other video game franchises, but we’ll need to set up a few ground rules before determining which roles to cast. Namely, which Legend of Zelda games will comprise the characters for the movie’s script?

Our resident movie geek, Skye, who has also happened to play most Legend of Zelda games, and I narrowed the games to Ocarina of Time and Breath of the Wild. Most moviegoers will know Breath of the Wild (along with Tears of the Kingdom, Breath of the Wild is the most recent Zelda video game duology), while Ocarina of Time is one of the first classic Zelda games that added a healthy dose of mythology. Both are stellar games. We couldn’t decide on one over the other, but the Legend of Zelda movie could pull from more than one video game. Let’s merge Ocarina of Time and Breath of the Wild.

Note: Kyra Kyle wrote their segment well before the official Legend of Zelda movie cast its Link and Zelda. They chose to keep their original actors in their roles instead of listing who got cast. Oh. What could’ve been?

Young Adult Link: Morgan Davies

Morgan Davies is a young actor with many high-profile roles in his short career. Danny from Evil Dead Rise and Koby from the Netflix live-action One Piece series top his resume. With his experience, Morgan Davies should have no problem pulling off a twenty-something Link. It doesn’t matter if the Legend of Zelda’s director chooses for Link to be a silent protagonist (like early-era Zelda games) or if Link will have a speaking role. Davies has the talent and the look for Link. He also pairs well (in age) with who I have planned for Princess Zelda.

I know. I know. Morgan Davies is one half of the Link/Zelda meme that’s going around, and I’m going with the other half, too. This pairing is too perfect.

Princess Zelda: Hunter Schafer

Yes! I went with Hunter Schafer as Princess Zelda. She looks just like her. I couldn’t believe those were her actual ears. I love it. Schafer also has a small but impressive experience. Tigris Snow in The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes and Jules Vaughn in Euphoria top her resume. She’s an actress with the ability and the look to pull off the title character, Princess Zelda. I don’t care if Hunter Schafer as Princess Zelda is a meme at this point. Schafer, in this role, makes too much sense. Make this happen, Nintendo.

Ganon/Ganondorf: Sterling K. Brown

I cast Sterling K. Brown in a lot of different roles. That’s because the This Is Us actor is phenomenal, and I’d love to see him in just about anything. Sterling K. Brown will bring a layered approach to the role of Ganon or Ganondorf (depending on which Legend of Zelda story the movie chooses). My fear is that Ganon could be boiled down to a cardboard cutout villain. Sterling K. Brown wouldn’t let that happen. He’d give us a Ganon performance for the ages.

Young Link: Christian Convery

I’m including Christian Convery as Young Link because the main game mechanism in Ocarina of Time is that Link goes back to when he’s a child. We may need a Young Link. Christian Convery (star of the Netflix series Sweet Tooth) looks like a young Morgan Davies and could hold his own as an actor, but he could age out of the role. Young Link is definitely one of those roles you could cast an unknown.

Impa: Michelle Yeoh

The incomparable Michelle Yeoh would make a great Impa at any age. Impa is one of those characters whose age varies greatly from one Legend of Zelda game to the next. Everything, Everywhere, All at Once’s Yeoh has had plenty of experience portraying action roles (at various ages) and has the acting chops to pull off one of Princess Zelda’s loyal protectors. My only doubt in casting Yeoh as Impa is that it could be seen as typecasting. But I love Impa as a character, and Yeoh would be fantastic in this role.

Saria: Maisie Williams

Saria is one of the first sages Link meets during Ocarina of Time. She’s even the sage who presents Link with his very own fairy, Navi. More on Navi in a minute. Maisie Williams has plenty of history acting in a fantasy setting. See her work as Arya in Game of Thrones. Williams has a knack for playing characters who defy social norms. Saria is the only sage to stand up for Link when Mido spread rumors that Link was responsible for the Great Deku Tree’s death. Saria is added in sealing away Ganon during the Ocarina of Time’s finale.

Navi: Awkwafina

I’m doing this one for the LOLs. Many argue that Awkwafina gets cast as a voice actor far too often. In fact, she was in ten animated movies or television shows in two years. Some people claim that Awkwafina getting cast in yet another voice acting role would be so annoying. Enter Navi, one of the most annoying characters in video game history. Hey! Listen! Can you hear Awkwafina screaming, Hey, Listen over and over again? I can. It’s hilarious.

Skull Kid: Elliot Page

There’s a debate as to whether Skull Kid makes an appearance in Ocarina of Time or not. Even if you believe Skull Kid doesn’t appear in Ocarina of Time, you can always tease the antagonist of a future Zelda movie by giving Skull Kid (the main antagonist during the events of Majora’s Mask) a cameo. Over his long, illustrious career, we haven’t seen Elliot Page portray too many villains. Page could make for a great dark and twisted version of Link.

Riju: Lana Condor

Lana Condor made her acting debut as Jubilee in the X-Men film franchise, but she gained international stardom with the All the Boys series. Despite Riju being one of the youngest leaders in Breath of the Wild, she rules with kindness and wisdom beyond her years. Lana Condor has built a solid resume that shows her versatility. She’ll need to tap into all of that experience while playing Riju.

Mipha: Auli’i Cravalho

Mipha rules a tribe of half-human, half-dolphin species. Reserved and introverted, Mipha is fiercely loyal to her friends, especially Link. In fact, during events in Breath of the Wild, Mipha insists that she and Link schedule some one-on-one time after the final battle. Auli’i Cravalho got her big break as the voice actor behind Moana. She’s kept busy in Hollywood and Broadway as a triple-threat (acting, singing, and dancing). Cravlho could easily pull off the strong but kind Mipha.

Revali: Dan Levy

Humanoid bird Revali will be full CGI, so it doesn’t matter if the actor portraying him looks similar to the character. Revali’s temperament is more in play. The champion of the Rito tribe is arrogant and has a sardonic outward personality, especially when he’s around Link. Dan Levy could easily pull off such a character, and he gets extra points because Revali looks like he’s a fully transformed version of Moira Rose’s (Catherine O’Hara’s) role in The Crowening, which is a reference to Dan Levy’s television mother in Schitt’s Creek.

Prince Sidon: Lamorne Morris

Lamorne Morris may be too old to portray Prince Sidon, but this role will use heavy CGI. That means that it matters if Morris’s vibe matches Sidon. The prince of the Zora people is enthusiastic and sees the sunny side of situations. That reminds me of Morris’s character on New Girl. He brings energy to all of his roles and would make a fantastic Prince Sidon.

Urbosa: Laverne Cox

Champion of the Gerudo, Urbosa is an imposing figure. Tall, slender, and muscular, Urbosa’s frame doesn’t match her personality. She’s a gentle and kind leader who only uses her strength and combat prowess when needed. Orange is the New Blacks’ Laverne Cox would make a perfect Urbosa. Laverne Cox deserves to be in more franchises. Watching her act opposite Sterling K. Brown’s Ganon would be a joy.

That’s all I have for my Legend of Zelda casting. Let’s see what Skye has in store.

Skye’s Picks

The choices I made for this casting call were my trickiest yet. In the past, the roles I’ve cast have been well-developed with complex backstories and personalities. For The Legend of Zelda, the characters aren’t “people” so much as “archetypes.” Not that I dislike these characters, but being a symbol as opposed to a person makes it harder for me to find people to fill these roles. I’m happy with the choices I made, but wow. I spent way longer on this than any sane person should have. Either way, these are my choices.

Link: Josh Hutcherson

Link was the last role I filled. It took me a while to figure out who could be both young enough and old enough to pull off Link’s look while having enough acting experience for a non-speaking role. In the end, Josh Hutcherson felt like a good choice. He’s been acting since he was a child and at an age where he can pass as a young adult. That’s perfect for Link. Also, if the filmmakers decided to keep Link mute, Hutcherson has the expressions and body language to come across as strong and stoic.

Zelda: Hunter Schafer

Zelda was the easiest role for me to cast. I had heard talk online about the possibility of Hunter Schafer playing Zelda, and I was on board as soon as I saw her. Just look at her. That’s not an actress playing Zelda, that’s literally Zelda. Case closed. I knew that Kyra Kyle was going to choose her for this role as well, so I spent a while considering who else I thought could fit this role. In the end, I just couldn’t find anyone. Hunter Schafer is living proof of the existence of the Goddess Hylia.

Ganon/Ganondorf: Alan Rickman (Posthumously)

Ganon was an interesting role to cast. I’m unsure which version of Zelda the film will be based on, but Alan Rickman could’ve made a great Ganon in more ways than one. If they’re going for a ruthless monster, Alan Rickman could’ve done it. If they’re going for a sly, calculating Ganondorf, Alan Rickman would’ve been amazing. In more ways than one, Alan Rickman could’ve given us a layered and interesting villain with his interpretation of Ganon/Ganondorf. Unfortunately, we’ll never see it. Rest in peace.

Young Link: (Young) Haley Joel Osment

Haley Joel Osment was the go-to child actor back in the 90s. He had loads of experience as a young actor. Given that, I don’t think he ever did a non-speaking role, so the possibility of Haley Joel Osment as Young Link could’ve been attention-getting. To me, he exudes the energy of having a lot of potential, hidden wisdom, and a good heart, which is exactly what you want for Young Link. Can I live in the timeline where Haley Joel Osment plays Young Link?

Impa: Uma Thurman

Impa has been portrayed in a variety of different ways in the Zelda series. If the filmmakers decide to go the route of Ocarina of Time, Uma Thurman would be a great Impa. Given her experience in several movie roles over her prolific career, Thurman could easily pass as the attendant/protector/guide of Princess Zelda. With Thurman’s expertise as a character actress, I have no doubt she could pull off a wise, measured, and strong character like Impa.

Saria: Mara Wilson

Mara Wilson is yet another prolific 90s child actor. I’m not going to act like every role she had in her heyday was great, but Wilson brought a Saria-esque energy to each of them. Although I have more confidence that she could play Saria now than before. Since The Legend of Zelda’s story is constantly in flux, I’m sure the writers could find an excuse for Saria to be older than she originally appeared in Ocarina of Time. That’s what I like about Zelda. Just look at that side-by-side. Need I say more?

Navi: Tress MacNeille

Speaking of having fun with things, Navi was my favorite role to cast. After hearing Kyra Kyle’s choice for the role, I thought it made a lot of sense. I gave it some thought, and I feel like I found another comedically inclined actress. Putting Tress MacNeille’s experience aside, she has the comedic chops and vocals to add a much-needed sense of levity to the film. While Navi is known for her pesky nature, Tress MacNeille could be a great balance of funny, annoying, and lovable.

Skull Kid: (Young) Jim Carrey

On the surface, I think it’s unlikely for the filmmakers to go the Majora’s Mask route. It’s a bit too niche of a Zelda title and not emblematic of the whole series. However, a young Jim Carrey would make a great Skull Kid if they did. Since Skull Kid’s face is rarely shown, much of his personality would come through his physicality, and that screams young Jim Carrey to me. He could pull off a combination of funny, mischievous, creepy, and dramatic all in one role. Also, the fact he’d be wearing a mask would be a fun in-joke to his 1994 film, The Mask.

Riju: Naomi Scott

I don’t care for the 2019 Aladdin. Who does? However, Naomi Scott as Jasmine is a notable strength of the film. Scott showed dedication to her craft despite a lack of script support, and making her Riju in The Legend of Zelda movie could give her a real chance to shine. Riju, as the chieftain of the Gerudo Tribe, has a fearless disposition and commands authority. Since Riju recently became chieftain, Naomi Scott could convey that, despite her inexperience, Riju is trying her best.

Mipha: Tami Stronach

It’s been a minute since I’ve played Breath of the Wild and, by proxy, seen what Mipha looks like. After I saw images of her, I couldn’t get the thought of The Child-Like Empress from NeverEnding Story out of my head. So, I’m going with Tami Stronach as Mipha. As time has passed, Stronach has accepted more producing roles, but she does act here and there. Since she defined what royalty looked like for one generation, she could do the same for another as Mipha.

Revali: Jeremy Renner

There isn’t much explanation behind my choice of Jeremy Renner as Revali. Even in Breath of the Wild, Revali didn’t get much development or an identity. He was the ancient champion of the Rito (bird) tribe. He’d likely be created through make-up, CGI, or a combination of the two. Pretty much any actor who plays Revali would work. It’s funny for me to imagine Jeremy Renner getting typecast as a bow user. That’s the only reason I picked Renner. Tee-hee!

Prince Sidon: (Young) Ryan Gosling

When I imagine the character of Prince Sidon, he’s the goofball partner who enriches your adventure while having your back. That’s why I couldn’t help but imagine a younger Ryan Gosling in this role. Back in the day, Gosling had a way of portraying characters with likable personalities, charming relationships, and a comedic edge. Gosling still has those capabilities, but a younger version of him would be a better fit for this role. Sidon is also meant to be Mipha’s younger brother.

Urbosa: Padma Lakshmi

Unfortunately, Padma Lakshmi doesn’t have many mainstream roles today, but the Urbosa role has her written all over it. As the ancient champion of the Gerudo Tribe, Urbosa is a gallant, stalwart, and authoritative fighter. Urbosa has the strength, finesse, and know-how to bring her enemies to their knees, and that’s why I can’t help but imagine Padma Lakshmi as her. While Lakshmi’s age may put limits on what she’s physically capable of, her personality is perfect. It would also be great to see her in another mainstream film.

Hey, hey! Kyra Kyle here again. Those are our picks for the upcoming Legend of Zelda movie. Who would you cast in these roles? Heck, would add anyone else to this cast of characters? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Top 5 Pixar Movies

Happy August, Geekly Gang! My bi-monthly movie posts are usually based on a holiday or awareness event. With August, I have no clue what would work, so I decided to make August a wildcard. Instead of holiday or “Month of Honor” movies, I’d like to take this time to talk about one of my most beloved animation studios, Pixar.

I’ve mentioned my preference for Pixar films over Disney films on my movie blog (TGIMovies), just not with the Geekly Gang. I still enjoy classic Disney, but if I had to choose which studio has more personal, relatable, and adult themes in their films, it’d be Pixar. To this day, many of Pixar’s films are household names and have raised a generation of film lovers. Me included. I’d like to honor my favorites in the post. I hope you enjoy!

5) Toy Story

It’s hard not to include a Toy Story film. While I enjoyed Toy Story 2 and Toy Story 3, the original has always been my favorite. Despite the now-outdated (yet charming) animation, the magic of childhood is what keeps me coming back to the first Toy Story. When I first saw Toy Story as a kid, it ignited my love for toys and my imagination. The filmmakers knew what it felt like to have a friend you could hold in your hand. Not only that, but the first Toy Story encouraged me to analyze films for deeper meanings.

After countless viewings in my childhood, I started thinking about why I enjoyed Toy Story so much. I broke down the situations, how effective Sid was as an antagonist, and how the toys are really a reflection of their owners. I started doing this with Toy Story at the age of 10. I couldn’t help but include Toy Story on this list. And Pixar wouldn’t be what it is today without Toy Story. Toy Story easily claims the fifth spot, but over time, I’ve grown to love other Pixar films a bit more.

4) WALL-E

I adore WALL-E. The idea, the execution, the visuals, and the experience are unlike anything else in Pixar’s library. Given the lack of dialogue, the characters’ actions and the visuals tell the story. I respect WALL-E for its dedication to visual storytelling while still being a mainstream, big-budget children’s movie. This shows the filmmakers have deep respect for children by letting them draw their own conclusions.

As an adult, my favorite aspect of WALL-E is its message. WALL-E is unequivocally an environmental movie, but it’s unlike any other environmental film. Most others look at the issue from a pessimistic perspective, but WALL-E is (as far as I know) the only optimistic one I’ve seen. WALL-E addresses the issue realistically while urging us to make a change and focusing on the good we can do if we just try. I’ve already reviewed WALL-E at length on my blog; you can check it out here if you’d like to see my more detailed thoughts.

3) The Incredibles

The Incredibles is a movie that pops into my head without warning. I remember watching The Incredibles as a kid, getting engaged in the action, drawing comparisons between the Parrs and my own family, and loving the comedic beats. What sets The Incredibles apart from other superhero films is how it wasn’t based on a comic, and it preceded the comic-book film boom of today. Part of me can’t help but wonder if the success of The Incredibles paved the way for the reintroduction of superhero movies.

Much like other classic Pixar films, The Incredibles is chock-full of things that went over my head as a child. It still appeals to my inner child, but it challenges me in my adulthood by discussing mature topics. I never noticed it before, but The Incredibles deals with concepts like suicide, targeted legal/government actions, civil rights, big business, socio-economic divides, and cultural genocide. When I was young, all I remembered was “No capes,” but now I know what a difficult place the world is. Thanks, Incredibles.

2) Inside Out

Inside Out has a simplistic premise of emotions controlling your actions. I first saw Inside Out when I was approaching my teenage years, and Inside Out managed to put life in perspective. Inside Out’s greatest strength is its realistic depiction of emotions, but my favorite aspect is how it manages to be both one and two stories at the same time. Inside Out is technically a movie about emotions inside the head of Riley Andersen, but it’s really about Riley herself.

We see what Riley’s emotions go through to keep her on track, and the effects of those actions on Riley in the real world. In the process, Inside Out paints a nearly perfect picture of what it feels like as a real-life girl going through a crisis. When I first saw Inside Out, I saw myself in Riley. I felt her inner turmoil. As I’ve gotten older, Inside Out continues to help me work through difficult past experiences while trying to be the best person I can. What a movie.

1) Finding Nemo

A major part of why Finding Nemo claims the top spot is its story and characters. The characters endeared themselves to me, and the situation they found themselves in was engaging. Each character’s distinct personality, relatable goals, and identifiable flaws make them real. I’ve always preferred Marlin’s story over Nemo’s. In fact, Finding Nemo is the movie that taught me how my own parents are more complex than I first thought.

Before I saw Finding Nemo, I thought my parents were benevolent beings who mercifully gave me life and could do no wrong. I was kinda dumb. Finding Nemo showed me how difficult a parent’s life could be. My parents were more like me, and they have significantly more problems. Granted, a not insignificant part of me wanted to put myself in danger so they could “prove” that to me, so I may have originally misunderstood that point in Finding Nemo. This movie holds a special place in my heart. Finding Nemo features fabulous animation, spot-on pacing, timeless characters, and its story is unforgettable. Without a doubt, Finding Nemo is my favorite Pixar movie.

There are plenty of Pixar films that didn’t make this list. This list was difficult to make because there are so many great Pixar films to choose from. Maybe this post can help y’all decide your favorite Pixar films. Do you agree with my picks? What would you change? Are there any Pixar movies you’re excited about? Feel free to leave a comment; we always love hearing from y’all. Also, why not give your parents a hug? I’m sure they miss you. Take care and keep watching movies!

Fantastic Four: First Steps Review

Happy Friday, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here with a Fantastic Four: First Steps review. Right off the bat, I must say 2025 is a banner year for superhero films and shows. The DCEU had been flailing for years; Superman (2025) gives the franchise new hope. The MCU has been a shell of itself in previous years, but Thunderbolts* and Fantastic Four: First Steps have been a return to form. I love that little MCU homework is needed for Fantastic Four: First Steps. Spider-Man: Homecoming aside, Fantastic Four: First Steps is the closest the MCU has felt to a Phase One movie in almost a decade. Fantastic!

I’ll try to avoid spoilers in this review. If you’ve read the Fantastic Four comic book, you should know the basis for a Galactus story. Fantastic Four: First Steps is the most comic book accurate Fantastic Four film. I mentioned in a previous Geekly News post that Shalla-Bal does have a basis in the comics; she’s Norrin Radd’s longtime romantic interest and has powers comparable to the Silver Surfer. In alternate universes, Shalla-Bal becomes Galactus’s herald in Radd’s stead, so if Earth 828 (nice tribute to Jack Kirby’s birthday, August 28th) is an alternate universe, it makes sense if she becomes Galactus’s herald. This allows Radd to become the Silver Surfer in Earth 616 (or some other Marvel universe). And Galactus is terrifying.

Galactus reminds me of the Reapers in Mass Effect: part living being and part machine. This visual effects decision makes sense. It allows for Galactus to look like his comic book counterpart. I cheered when I saw him onscreen. Galactus’s look is another great comic book accurate element. Johnny Storm figuring out Shalla-Bal’s history and pleading with her to save Earth was another classic comic book moment. Both Radd and Shalla-Bal sacrificed themselves to save their planet (Zenn-La) from Galactus, only to become Galactus’s pawns and destroy other planets.

I even liked the montage at the beginning of Fantastic Four: First Steps. It shows the team has been in the superhero/explorer/adventuring business for years, while not bogging down the film with extra runtime. While I would’ve liked to have seen John Malkovich’s Red Ghost, it made sense for Fantastic Four: First Steps to cut his scenes from the movie. Fantastic Four: First Steps had a tight 114-minute runtime. Just under two hours. That’s unheard of with modern blockbusters. Rumors swirled a few months ago that Fantastic Four: First Steps had a runtime of over two and a half hours, which would’ve made it one of the longest MCU films before edits. Fantastic Four went from being one of the longest MCU films to the fifth shortest. The audience got what it needed in that runtime. Kudos to Fantastic Four for cutting unneeded scenes.

Fantastic Four: First Steps is just what the MCU needed. Just like Superman (2025) got me excited for DC Comics movies again, Fantastic Four: First Steps got me excited for the MCU again. And like Superman, I have some notes for Fantastic Four: First Steps. The biggest is Galactus’s timeline. While Galactus does lumber through the universe on his never-ending quest for sustenance, it doesn’t make sense that Earth prepares for the titan’s visit when he’s already in our solar system. Galactus passes Jupiter by the time the Fantastic Four share their plan with the world, a plan that would take months to prepare. When the team’s first plan fails, they don’t switch to their second plan until Galactus is passing the moon. What? That timeline makes little sense.

Galactus entering our galaxy when the Fantastic Four share their first plan, and then reaching Jupiter when the Fantastic Four pivot to another plan, would make more sense. This is a nitpick, but I chuckled at this timeline’s absurdity. Invisible Woman giving birth in space with no bodily fluids is another one of my silly nitpicks. I get why Fantastic Four: First Steps chose not to include a zero-gravity placenta, but I figured I’d mention the lack of bodily fluids. Don’t get me wrong, I just finished a jumbo-sized popcorn and pretzel bites before the birth scene. My stomach appreciated the lack of floating bodily fluids. Still, Franklin Richards’s birth was the most sterile birth I’ve ever seen.

I could mention another nitpick or two, but those are smaller nitpicks, and they didn’t detract from Fantastic Four: First Steps. This is the Fantastic Four film I’ve waited for decades, and I’m so glad I got to review it on Geekly. I watched the 2015 Fantastic Four in the theater and reviewed it. Fantastic Four: First Steps was a huge upgrade. This film features the most comic book accurate Fantastic Four. And I hope Fantastic Four: First Steps begins a new trend for the MCU: less MCU homework for each project and cutting out unnecessary scenes for tighter runtimes. Fantastic Four: First Steps continues the MCU’s upward trajectory. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Geekly Casting: Justice League

It’s been a couple of months since we released our MCU X-Men Geekly casting, so we decided to do the same for the DCU’s Justice League. Hey, hey! Kyra Kyle here. Like our previous post, I’ll handle the first part of our Geekly casting: modern actors. Fortunately, Superman just dropped, and we have some clarity on who will play certain roles. That makes it easier for me. Ha-ha, Skye. By the time we’re writing this, we will not have watched Superman. Geekly should have a Superman review posted if you want to hear our thoughts on the actors’ performances. We’ll link our Superman review here if I remember to do so and you’re interested.

Skye will continue with actors who may have aged out of certain roles or sliding actors into roles posthumously. Ugh! Skye’s giving Hollywood ideas on whose faces they should impose on body doubles. Who am I kidding? I may want to see some of these actors in these roles, too. Without further ado, let’s get to the cast list.

Kyra’s Picks

If the DCU has already cast someone in a role, I chose that actor for that role and provided commentary on how I think the actor will manage. If an actor hasn’t been officially cast as a role (as of April 2025), I’ll usually choose an actor from fan castings. Note: I go rogue at least once.

Superman: David Corenswet

Before Superman dropped earlier this month, DC fans complained about the new Superman suit, but I haven’t heard many people knock David Corenswet’s casting. He’s a relative unknown, which I like. Corenswet’s resume reminds me of Christopher Reeve’s before his stint as Supes. Corenswet happens to be the same height as Christopher Reeve (6’4″), too, and he looks the part. Time will tell if he can embody the Man of Steel.

Batman: Glen Powell

Batman is the first in a line of castings in which I wouldn’t mind seeing people reprise their roles. Heck, I would’ve liked to have seen Henry Cavill in another Superman movie. Batfleck is gone. He did a serviceable job with the material. Robert Pattinson is not going to be the DCU’s Batman either. That’s too bad. So, why not go with one of Hollywood’s new it boys, Glen Powell? He starred in the hit Top Gun: Maverick, has shown comedic range in the rom-com Anyone But You, and the dark comedy Hit Man. Powell would make a playboy out of Bruce Wayne, which’d be interesting. He also refuses to act in the MCU and has expressed interest in portraying Batman. That’s always a plus.

Speaking of pluses, I’m including a second choice as Batman: Winston Duke. He’s also expressed interest in portraying Batman on the big screen, and he’s already done so on a podcast. If Duke looks and sounds familiar, it’s because he plays M’Baku in the Black Panther franchise. I didn’t pick Duke as my top choice because James Gunn wants a Batman closer in age to Superman. Duke is over a decade older than Corenswet. Drat!

Even so, I could see Winston Duke playing Lucas “Luke” Fox taking over for Bruce Wayne. Luke is the son of Lucius Fox. I’d love to see Morgan Freeman reprise his role as the elder Fox to Duke’s younger Fox.

Wonder Woman: Elizabeth Debicki

Gal Gadot will not return as Wonder Woman. That’s too bad, but she may be too short. Wonder Woman is supposed to stand eye-to-eye with Superman, and the new Superman is three inches taller than Henry Cavill. Elizabeth Debicki won’t need heels. She’s also close in age to Corenswet and has experience acting in period pieces, which will come in handy with the direction James Gunn has planned for the DCU.

Gunn announced that a Paradise Lost Wonder Woman prequel series will debut before Diana returns to the big screen. This series will chronicle the Amazons of Themyscira years before Wonder Woman’s birth, with politics (like the ones in Game of Thrones) playing a big role, and these political exploits should continue after Wonder Woman’s introduction. Debicki’s turn as Diana, Princess of Wales, in The Crown is a perfect fit. And if this happens, Debicki will have portrayed Princess Diana and Wonder Woman’s alter-ego, Diana Prince. Fun!

The Flash: Elliot Page

I’ve seen fan-castings of Elliot Page as The Flash, and I’m on board. Have you seen him? He’s cut. And Hollywood tends to cast people with slighter frames to portray The Flash, so I can see it. A Page turn (lol) as the Crimson Speedster would give him a clean break from his previous work as Kitty Pryde in the X-Men movie franchise. There have been multiple people to don The Flash costume, so it doesn’t matter that Page is older than many other main cast members. I could also see Grant Gustin (who portrayed The Flash in the Arrowverse) reprise the role.

Green Lantern/Hal Jordan: Kyle Chandler

This is another DCU role I won’t have to fan-cast. James Gunn has confirmed Kyle Chandler as Hal Jordan in the upcoming Lanterns Max series. Chandler is best known as Eric Taylor in Friday Night Lights. He has an impressive resume and should give depth to an older Hal Jordan. The DCU could have Jordan’s Green Lantern train a younger John Stewart, who will also be featured in Lanterns. Gunn cast Chandler’s younger co-star from Friday Night Lights, Aaron Pierre to play John Stewart.

Yes! We’re getting two Green Lanterns in what should be an interstellar buddy cop show, Lanterns. Throw in Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner, and we have a party.

Aquaman: Ryan Murphy

Jason Momoa’s inclusion in the DCU confused me. At first, I thought Momoa would continue as Aquaman, but surprise, he’s playing Lobo. Honestly, Momoa makes a better Lobo than Aquaman. Instead of casting another acting veteran, I’m going with former Olympic swimmer Ryan Murphy. Decades ago, it was a tradition to cast a swimmer as Tarzan. Wouldn’t a professional swimmer make more sense as Aquaman? I don’t know if Ryan Murphy has any desire to act, but Murphy has the look for Arthur Curry.

Martian Manhunter: Sterling K. Brown

If Aaron Pierre wasn’t already cast as a young John Stewart (Green Lantern), I would’ve gone with Sterling K. Brown. Since John Stewart is off the table, I’m casting Sterling K. Brown (This Is Us) as Mars’s last son. Martian Manhunter has an origin akin to Superman’s, but his storyline is far more tragic; he watched his people die. The DCU will need an actor who can portray the trauma associated with Martian Manhunter’s origin. Brown would give the role some much-needed depth and gravitas.

Justice League Opponents

This next section will cover a handful of enemies the Justice League could face in their first few outings. We’re years away from knowing any details, so we’ll be throwing several things against this metaphorical wall. Which one of these castings do you hope sticks?

Darkseid: Christopher Judge

Known for his role as Kratos in the God of War video games, Christopher Judge has the perfect voice to portray Darkseid. Let’s face it. Darkseid will be mostly CGI, so whoever lends their voice to Darkseid matters most, but Judge also happens to be a former American Football player, so he could easily pull off a live-action Darkseid if needed. Judge has also done several voice-overs for Marvel characters, most notably Magneto in X-Men Evolution and in some video games, so he’s due for a DC Comics role. He has the presence for Darkseid.

Vandal Savage: Khary Payton

This is where I went rogue. I didn’t go with any of the casting rumors (Dave Bautista who portrayed Drax in Guardians of the Galaxy) or fan castings (Keanu Reeves or Johnny Depp). Khary Payton is a DC Animated Universe voice acting legend. He’s given Cyborg his voice for decades (Teen Titans and Teen Titans Go), but Payton’s resume doesn’t stop there: Aqualad, Brick, Robotman, Black Manta, and Black Lightning are a few other notable roles. Payton is so ubiquitous in the DC Animated Universe that he’s even portrayed himself. Ironically, Vandal Savage is one of the few DC Comics roles he hasn’t yet portrayed, but Payton has the talent, and we need to see him in more live-action roles besides Ezekiel in The Walking Dead.

Similarly, Vandal Savage is criminally underused in live-action DC Comics media. Payton has the range to bring a man who’s over 50,000 years old to life. Savage has also been known to disguise his voice. What better actor to take on a role like that than one who’s voiced almost every character in the DC Universe?

Ultra-Humanite: Dave Bautista

Dave Bautista is confirmed to portray a major DCU character. It isn’t confirmed who he’ll play. While many people think he may play Vandal Savage, I’d rather see Bautista as Ultra-Humanite. First, James Gunn teased Bautista’s inclusion in the DCU during promotion for Superman, which makes me think Bautista’s character will have a connection to the Man of Steel; Ultra-Humanite was the first super-powered villain Superman ever faced and has a professional rivalry with Lex Luthor. Second, Bautista doesn’t want to bulk up for roles anymore. Ultra-Humanite’s look will most likely happen with motion capture.

The guy pictured above and to the left was Ultra-Humanite before the failed science experiment transformed him into a monstrosity. Bautista even looks the part of a pre-accident Ultra-Humanite. I hope we see Ultra-Humanite in upcoming DCU movies. Despite being comics’ first super-powered villains, Ultra-Humanite is seldom seen in live-action projects.

Brainiac: Michael Emerson

Michael Emerson (Lost, Person of Interest) recently voiced Brainiac in the second season of Adult Swim’s My Adventures With Superman. Emerson’s turn as Brainiac differs from most others. Sure, he triggered Krypton’s demise after peace talks (between warring factions) began, and that tracks for the villain. But Emerson’s Brainiac takes villainy further by recovering Kara Zor-El (Supergirl and Superman’s cousin) and brainwashing her into believing she’s his daughter. Brainiac and Kara destroy entire worlds that refuse to comply with the killer android’s vision of perfection.

Emerson provides a captivating vocal performance, one with the calm and intelligence one would expect from Brainiac, but this slowly fades. Emerson’s Brainiac becomes unhinged and more emotional as his desire for perfection and compliance are disrupted by Superman and Supergirl (after she breaks free of Brainiac’s control). I’d love to see Emerson’s big screen portrayal of Brainiac, a role he was destined to play.

Lex Luthor: Nicholas Hoult

James Gunn threw me another bone for this one. Again, while writing this post, I have no idea what kind of performance Nicholas Hoult gave in Superman. You’ll have to read Geekly’s review to see our thoughts. But months prior to watching Superman, I’m excited to see Hoult’s portrayal of Lex. Hoult has a varied resume. He broke out in the brilliant BBC teen drama Skins in 2007. I liked him in the title role of Renfield, proving he has comedic chops, and Hoult has experience in comic book movies as Beast in the X-Men prequel movies.

The Joker: Crispin Glover

Truth time. I placed the Joker at the end of my list because the character could use a break from live-action movies. We’ve had five actors portray the Joker in live-action projects during the past seventeen years. The Joker makes eight appearances in movies during that same time frame. That’s a new Joker every three years, and the Joker has made an appearance in a live-action project every other year for almost two decades. Yowza!

That said, James Gunn has already announced that a new Joker will appear in the upcoming The Brave and The Bold movie. This movie could play akin to an anthology film, and Gunn prefers an older actor to portray the Joker. Crispin Glover is my pick for this role. First, he looks the part. Second, he has the acting chops and experience to pull off a layered Joker. Third, Glover is known for his unorthodox and sinister comedic roles. That sounds like a perfect Joker to me.

If the DCU were to go with a younger actor to portray the Joker, I’d pick Macaulay Culkin. Culkin hasn’t done much acting outside of voice work recently, but the roles he’s taken are bizarre to the point where they’re unhinged, and he’s known for his comedic timing. Culkin could make an interesting Joker.

That’s all I have. I’ll hand this post over to Skye and see what she has in store.

Skye’s Picks

Hello, Geekly Gang! I’m back again, this time to discuss my casting choices for the DC Universe. It’s taken a while for the DC film crew to find their footing, but lately they seem to be on the right track. Because of that, many folks are wondering who might portray future DC Comics characters. Kyra Kyle has already offered their excellent choices for cast members, and I’m searching Hollywood’s past and present for my DC Universe casting choices. 😉

Superman: Henry Fonda (Posthumously)

Henry Fonda would’ve been a great choice for Kal-El. It’s a shame he wasn’t able to play the role while he was still with us. Rest in peace. Henry Fonda often fought for truth, justice, and the American way in his movies. Just look at the classic, 12 Angry Men. While he doesn’t have the body type for Superman, Fonda has the character, and Christopher Reeve flew into our hearts in the original Superman film series despite not having an overly muscular frame, so it’s not entirely unbelievable. Also, Henry Fonda was from Nebraska, and it borders Kansas. Case closed. JK

Batman: Michael Keaton

It’s hard for me to let Keaton go, even all these years later. I shouldn’t have to defend this choice. To clarify, I’m casting young Michael Keaton in this role. If it were possible to travel back in time to cast 1989 Michael Keaton in this role, I would. No disrespect to the current Michael Keaton; time has a huge impact on people. While it was novel seeing him reprise his role in The Flash, the time gap between The Flash and Batman Returns took a toll on his performance. Now all I need is a time machine.

Wonder Woman: Audrey Hepburn (Posthumously)

Yes, Aubrey Hepburn as Wonder Woman is another impossible choice, but it’s still fun to imagine. Even if you’re unfamiliar with her work, you’ve at least heard the name “Audrey Hepburn.” She was easily one of the most beloved actresses in Hollywood in her time, and if comic book films were as popular then as they are now, she surely would’ve been cast as Wonder Woman. Not only did she have unparalleled on-screen charisma, but her dedication to her craft meant that she would’ve had the chops to pull it off, too.

The Flash: Grant Gustin

Snap back to reality. Oh, there goes gravity. Anyway, we’re back in the realm of possibility with Grant Gustin portraying The Flash. I was stuck for a while with casting The Flash unil I remembered Grant Gustin. I loved Gustin’s portrayal of The Flash in the Arrowverse. No one else could pull it off in my eyes. Now we’ve come full circle. Grant Gustin isn’t the only one who could play The Flash in the DCU, but he is the one I’d most like to see. Grant Gustin as The Flash could also be a nice way to tie up loose ends.

Green Lantern (Hal Jordan): Ryan Reynolds

Hear me out. Yes, I remember the 2011 Green Lantern. I saw it. Unfortunately. Ryan Reynolds returning to the role today could explore a lot. Not only has Reynolds proven that he has respect for comics, given his successful Deadpool film series, but Reynolds’ return to the Hal Jordan role would right a past wrong. James Gunn did a similar thing with 2021’s The Suicide Squad. Why not give him the chance with Ryan Reynolds’ Green Lantern? It could also be another opportunity for Reynolds to take the piss out of the 2011 movie. It’ll never not be funny.

Aquaman: Michael Clarke Duncan (Posthumously)

I had some difficulty casting Aquaman, too. The DCU shocked me when Jason Momoa was announced as Lobo. So many people had fallen in love with Momoa as Aquaman. I haven’t seen a movie studio recast an actor audiences loved as one character to a different character within the same universe. After some thought, I decided to give another actor in a disappointing comic book film a second chance. Michael Clarke Duncan did a good job as Kingpin in 2003’s Daredevil. Duncan was an amazing actor. I would’ve liked to see his portrayal of the Prince of Atlantis.

Martian Manhunter: Sidney Poitier (Posthumously)

Sidney Poitier is another prolific character actor who could’ve knocked his performance out of the park. As of this writing, I have yet to see a proper Martian Manhunter portrayed on the big screen. If the legendary Sidney Poitier was still with us, I would be lined up outside the door for a week. Across his nearly 60-year career, Poitier has given us several complex and layered performances, which is exactly what I would want for a character like J’onn J’onzz. To introduce a lesser-known character for movie-goers in a film, you gotta swing big. As we’ve seen with Mr. Terrific in Superman 2025, all you need is the right person for the role.

Darkseid: James Earl Jones (Posthumously)

James Earl Jones’s passing was recent, so it still kinda hurts. If he were here to give us Darkseid, James Earl Jones would’ve defined the character for generations of film and comic lovers, especially if the DC Universe built up the battle with Darkseid like Marvel did with Thanos. James Earl Jones as Darkseid would’ve been DC fans’ cinematic vindication. You don’t need to be a film buff to know Jones’s portrayal of iconic characters like Darth Vader and Mufasa. His role as Darth Vader specifically would’ve made him a shoo-in for Darkseid. Rest in Peace, legend.

Vandal Savage: Henry Cavill

Henry Cavill has experience acting in DC films. Since the DCU recast of Jason Momoa as Lobo, Henry Cavill as Vandal Savage wouldn’t be too big of a stretch. Cavill wants to branch out with his roles; Vandal Savage could theoretically work. He’s had time to show off his chops as Geralt from The Witcher series and has shown his dedication to the craft by criticizing the writers of the show for their lack of authenticity. Since we’re starting fresh, and with Cavill’s interest in playing Wolverine, Vandal Savage could be a great way to introduce a villainous Henry Cavill.

Ultra-Humanite: Tobin Bell

Tobin Bell (Jigsaw from the Saw series) as Ultra-Humanite might be out of left field. Yes is it. Even for me, Bell as Ultra-Humanite is kinda random. When the DCU introduces Ultra-Humanite in gorilla form, he’ll obviously be CGI. You could have a physical actor do motion capture with the voice actor in a recording booth. Bell’s distinctive voice could be distracting to some, but you can’t deny that he’s had decades of experience being a criminal mastermind. Bell’s demeanor would make a diabolical Ultra-Humanite. Who wants to play a game?

Brainiac: Colin Firth

Brainiac is an unfeeling extra-terrestrial obsessed only with observation and research at the expense of all life. Yeah, that’s Colin Firth all over. Firth hasn’t played a character quite like Brainiac yet, but I believe his filmography is proof enough that he could pull it off. Over the years, Firth has given us several different villains with unique motivations and complex histories. By jumping into this comic film role, he could get back into the public eye and remind us of true evil. I don’t think movie-goers are ready for this Brainiac.

Lex Luthor: George Clooney

DC has already chosen someone to play Lex Luthor. While Nicholas Hoult’s portrayal of the character was good (not perfect), George Clooney’s Lex Luthor could be a game-changer. Clooney in a DCU role is another acting second chance; he absolutely deserves one. After going down in comic infamy for his role in Batman and Robin, Clooney’s cool and calculating personality would be a great match for Luthor. He’s got the intellect, business-type attitude, and calculating demeanor. Clooney’s just gotta shave his head. That’s not too much to ask. Right?

The Joker: Tim Curry

I saved the best for last. Not just that, but I’m hoping DC takes its time deciding who they want to portray The Joker. I certainly did. What’s important about The Joker is that he’s the character who can make or break a film. If you don’t get The Joker right, you’re probably Jared Leto. The kind of Joker you cast plays a huge part in determining a movie’s tone. Why Tim Curry? First, he’s one of those actors who immediately make every film better. Second, Tim Curry has been practicing for The Joker role his entire career. Third, to see that realized on the big screen would be awesome. Take your time, though, DCU. We’re not desperate for a Joker right now.

Hey, hey! Kyra Kyle again. Those are our picks for certain DCU roles. Who would you cast in these roles? Which roles should we cast next? Let us know in the comments. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Superman (2025) Review

Happy Friday, Geekly Gang! Kyra Kyle here. I watched Superman (2025) this past week, and I’ve had time to gather some thoughts. Truth time. I’ve had conflicting thoughts on Superman. It’s a fun watch, but is it trying to do too much too soon?

I like the idea of skipping Superman’s origin. We don’t need it. If you want to watch a good version of Superman’s origin, you can rewatch 1978’s Superman. Geekly even has an All Superman Movies Ranked post from last week. Superman (2025) does a good job of sprinkling in just enough of Superman’s origin, so rewatching Supes’ origin may not be necessary. David Corenswet’s portrayal of the Man of Steel is comic-book accurate, which is a step up from Henry Cavill’s Superman. I said this before, and I’ll say it again: I don’t blame Cavill for this misstep. The onus belongs to David S. Goyer and Zach Snyder. Those two missed the mark with Superman as a character.

After the Snyder-verse malaise, Superman (2025) is a breath of fresh air. Outside of Corenswet, most of the actors in Superman nail their character portrayals. Rachel Brosnahan behaves like a fusion between a young Margot Kidder Lois Lane and Lois from the comics. Nathan Fillion makes a great Guy Gardner. I can’t wait to see him in Lanterns. Skyler Gisondo is a fantastic Jimmy Olsen. And Edi Gahegi steals numerous scenes as Mister “God-Damned” Terrific. I always thought Mister Terrific was one of DC Comics’ underappreciated and underused heroes before this movie. I’m glad he had some time to shine.

Nicholas Hoult’s Lex Luthor is more of a mixed bag. I love Hoult’s portrayal of Lex during the first half of Superman. Lex’s cold demeanor when Superman bursts into his lair is peak Luthor. But then Hoult’s Lex leans over the top toward the end of the film. While Lex earned this crescendo during the events of Superman, part of me hoped he remained reserved, if only on the surface. I think that’s what made that scene with Lex sipping coffee as Superman bursts into his lair so great. Outwardly, Lex was in control, but you could see him seething underneath the skin. Such a good scene.

Superman even does a great job of setting up the DCU, and this is where the film may be trying to do too much too soon. Early MCU films established the universe’s characters in solo films. Superman uses Miracle-Gro for its universe. While I didn’t expect–or want–an origin story (most of the early MCU films included origin stories), I don’t know if a Captain America: Civil War-type story was the best place to begin the DCU. Civil War was a Phase Three MCU movie. Phase Three! You kinda leapfrogged two phases.

As a result, Lois and Clark’s relationship didn’t get enough time to develop. The most romantic scene between Lois and Clark is undercut by the Justice Gang fighting an interdimensional imp. (Quick note: The interdimensional imp could be none other than Mister Mxyzptlk.) Don’t get me wrong. I chuckled at Guy Gardner beating the imp over the head with a green bat, but I couldn’t tell you what Lois and Clark said during the scene when Clark first tells Lois he loves her. This is like a Rom-Com have one of the characters accidentally profess their love at dinner, but we have someone making silly faces outside the restaurant window and screaming booga-booga. What did he say? Did Superman say something important?

That said, I love how Superman’s world feels lived in. One of the few things I remember Clark telling Lois during the romantic scene is the Justice Gang said they don’t want or need his help against the interdimensional imp. This is why I’m conflicted. How much do you pare from this world to tell a more focused story? Where is the line between telling a great Superman story and setting up too much of the DCU? Honestly, I don’t know the answer to either of these questions.

What I do know is that Superman’s side characters, like Jimmy Olsen and Perry White, didn’t get enough screen time or character development. Olsen fared better than White, and both actors nailed the vibe of their comic book counterparts, but I would’ve liked more Olsen and White. Plotlines were condensed, not because there were more Superman stories to tell, but the DCU needed time to expand in a single film.

To Guy Gardner, Never change your hairstyle. You’re rocking that bowl cut.

Even though Superman suffers a little under the weight of launching a cinematic universe, this is an issue with most modern superhero films outside the MCU’s first phase, which was almost two decades ago. Yikes! Case in point, Batman (1989) is the last time a Batman film only featured one villain. Batman (1989) was over three and a half decades ago, and we’ve had almost a dozen Batman films since. Superhero movies have the impulse to add more when more isn’t always needed. The result can be an inch-deep ocean of a story, instead of a 700-foot deep river.

Despite any shortcomings, I enjoyed Superman. This film is comic-book accurate. My reservations about setting up too much of the DCU at once aside, Superman got me excited for Lanterns and Supergirl. The Supergirl cameo suggests that this version of Supergirl will borrow heavily from the excellent Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow comic storyline. I can’t wait to see Kara claw her way back from rock bottom.

Those are my thoughts, for now, about Superman (2025). Let us know what you thought of the film. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.

Superman Movies Ranked

The DCU launches later this week with James Gunn’s Superman. We’re getting prepared by ranking all the Superman movies up to this point. Hey, hey! Kyra Kyle here, Geekly Gang. As you’ll find out, I haven’t watched some of these movies in years, if not decades.

Many of these Superman movies are “products of their time.” That happens when a film was released in the ’70s and you’re watching it almost half a century later. We’ll have some exclusions on this list. We won’t include 1997’s Steel or 1984’s Supergirl because those were offshoots, not mainline Superman movies. We also won’t include team-up movies like 2016’s Batman v Superman or 2021’s Justice League; we’ll just cover the solo Superman films. Besides, Jim and I discussed our thoughts on Batman v Superman when it first released. Wow! That was a long time ago.

Let’s rank all the Superman movies, starting with sixth place and counting down to number one.

6) Man of Steel (2013)

From a technical standpoint, Man of Steel may be the most polished Superman movie (Superman Returns may have something to say about that), but that’s expected from the most recent Superman solo movie. And a sound Superman movie from a technical standpoint doesn’t necessarily make a great or even good Superman movie. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Let’s talk about the good elements within Man of Steel.

Man of Steel puts much time and effort into building up Krypton. Perhaps this is why we received a Krypton television series that no one wanted and few watched. Zod is fleshed out in this version of Superman more than he will be in our next entry, Superman II. Man of Steel gives more of a reason why Krypton has fallen into disrepair. That’s good.

In principle, I also like the idea of Superman needing to hone his skills and Ma Kent giving him the guidance he needs. I even like how the fight scenes incorporate the ground more than most recent superhero films. More on this point in Superman II. Can you tell I’m running out of steam for nice things to say? I could be missing a point or two, but let’s rip off the band-aid.

Man of Steel is the most disappointing Superman movie. It easily takes our sixth spot because it’s not a Superman movie. To be clear, I don’t blame Henry Cavill or any other cast member for this assessment. They did what they could with the material. Man of Steel has problems at the story and direction level.

Man of Steel hammered home Superman’s trauma. They do so at the narrative structure. Non-linear stories are the hallmark of a trauma story (like the Sweet Here After), so much so that writers will refer to non-linear storytelling as the trauma storytelling method. Superman seldom lends himself to trauma. Sure, he has issues he must overcome, but the level Man of Steel stoops to is worthy of Batman. Not every superhero is Batman. Superman is nothing like Batman. Supes has issues, yes. He doesn’t necessarily have trauma. Certainly not the deep-seated trauma Man of Steel presents. I half expected Superman to turn into Martian Manhunter. That person has trauma.

Man of Steel also ushered in the reluctant and darker version of heroes in the DCEU. The DCEU did this so much that the reluctant hero went from being a trope to a cliche. There isn’t much difference between a trope and a cliche, except that tropes can often be done well and cliches usually can’t. Man of Steel set the DCEU on a collision course with failure. Superman isn’t a reluctant hero. Wonder Woman usually isn’t a reluctant hero. Batman going over the edge–actually makes sense–but from a character standpoint, little else in the DCEU made sense.

I know I said that Zod and Krypton were fleshed out well in Man of Steel. That’s both a good and bad thing. Man of Steel relies too much on Krypton and builds it up so much that it neglects Kal-El’s relationship with Earth. Outside of Martha Kent, Superman has no connection with Earthlings. This was the worst possible move. I blame writer David S. Goyer. He turns everyone, including Leonardo da Vinci (Da Vinci’s Demons, which I don’t suggest watching), into Batman. Again, Superman is nothing like Batman.

I’ll end with Man of Steel’s wanton destruction. Many people have mentioned this before, but I’ll add my two cents. Superman doesn’t even attempt to draw Zod and the others to an unpopulated location. Superman does exactly that during his fight with Zod in Superman II. Why didn’t you do your homework, Davey? While it’s true Zod may have taken the battle back to a city or town, Superman should’ve attempted to draw fire away from humans. But this is a Superman who has no connection with Earth or humans. Man of Steel’s Superman isn’t really Superman.

Man of Steel would’ve claimed our fourth spot because it’s the fourth best movie of this bunch, but it’s not a Superman movie. They never call him Superman. Perhaps this is a movie about Skibidiman.

5) Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987)

I’ll try to stay positive at first while discussing every Superman movie, but Superman IV: The Quest for Peace makes that difficult. But not impossible. With an hour and a half runtime, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace is the shortest Superman film by at least thirty minutes. If another movie is eighty percent as bad as Superman IV: The Quest for Peace and runs thirty minutes to an hour longer, does that make the other movie worse? That’s a real debate for the next film on this list. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace is self-aware enough to know it should waste as little of a viewer’s time as it can, and I’ll say the movie’s pacing is good. Not great, but good.

There’s even a hint at a good story in Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. The Kryptonian judges, whom Superman asks for advice about ridding the world of all its nuclear weapons, warn him against Earth putting all their faith in one man, even if that man is Kal-El. Lex Luthor espouses this logic numerous times in the comics. I wonder if a version of Superman IV: The Quest for Peace’s script includes Lex worrying that Superman is too powerful. Instead, Superman IV leans heavily into “the threat of nuclear war is good for business.” While that’s a good motivation for Lex, he’d most likely spin that underlying desire as Superman is overreaching by ridding the world of its most dangerous weapons. But that’s Lex saying the quiet part out loud, and Superman IV: The Quest for Peace’s creatives had some naked political agendas.

The script and direction aren’t subtle with their politics. Even the tertiary story gets in on the action. A greedy businessman, Warfield (again, subtle), takes over the Daily Planet. He commodifies the news, and in the end, he gets his comeuppance. While I agree with Lacy Warfield’s (the man’s daughter) sentiment that a newspaper’s business should be journalism, not money, the message is ham-fisted at best. This exact scenario has played out in modern reporting, but that doesn’t mean the message wasn’t cranked to the highest volume and the nob yanked.

Any scene with the kid asking Superman to rid the world of nuclear weapons gives a bad name to saccharine. It’s beyond the term. The entire nuclear weapon storyline is a product of the Eighties. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace would look a lot different in today’s climate. And that brings us back to capitalism needing the threat of war to survive. Lex Luthor becomes a stand-in for capitalism, not caring where the money comes from so long as the money flows. In short, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace is over the top with its messaging.

Before I get into the horrid action sequences, let’s discuss that awkward double-date scene with Superman, Lois, Clark Kent, and Lacy Warfield. It’s the definition of cringe. Fortunately, the scene doesn’t last long, but leads to some eye-rolling situational comedy.

Yep. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace has some of the worst special effects in superhero cinema. What’s worse is that some of the head-scratching superpowers introduced in Superman II (more on that film later) return in Superman IV. Amnesiac kisses? Check. Telekinetic vision? Double check; Superman and Nuclearman use this ability. And Superman IV adds poisonous fingernails, which age Superman for some reason, for Nuclearman. What’s worse is that Superman IV reuses old footage. Many of the fight scenes repeat, and Lex even uses his dog whistle trick from the original Superman. Yikes!

Superman IV: The Quest for Peace takes the fifth spot for all these reasons, but it’s still a Superman movie. And because of Superman IV’s brevity and pacing, I watched this movie in fewer sittings than the next film on this list.

4) Superman III (1983)

Superman IV: The Quest for Peace may be the worst movie in the Superman franchise (I don’t include Man of Steel as a Superman movie), but Superman III is disappointing. If it wasn’t for the existence of Man of Steel, Superman III would be the most disappointing Superman movie. I’ll try to say some nice things about Superman III before I list the numerous ways the movie failed.

An internal Superman struggle is a good direction for a story. Superman III introduces a synthetic Kryptonite, and the synthetic Kryptonite turns Superman evil. Not bad. It’s a little hokey that Clark Kent physically walks away from the Nega-Superman to fight himself, but this scene may have inspired Black Kryptonite (Smallville “Crusade” in 2004 and eventually the comics), which does just that. An exposed Kryptonian splits into two identities, one good and one evil. An internal Superman struggle is a solid foundation. Unfortunately, Superman II also had a hint of internal struggle, so the series was already getting repetitive.

I also liked Clark’s return to Smallville. Superman is a small-town kid at heart, and he often returns to Smallville in the comics. Heck. One of the most recent Superman stories features Lois and Clark moving to Smallville and starting a family. The Lana Lang love story felt forced, but I can see why the Superman film series wanted to shake things up from the status quo of Lois and Clark. And Lana is canonically one of Superman’s love interests, one of the few outside of Lois Lane.

Oh, what could’ve been. Here comes the disappointment. Early drafts of Superman III’s script included Bizarro and Brainiac. While watching the final fight sequences, you can see Bizarro and Brainiac’s influence. Superman III’s second conflict centers around Richard Pryor’s character, who can somehow speak to computers (a stand-in for Brainiac), asking a billionaire to construct a killer computer (a second stand-in for Brainiac), and this supercomputer transforms a woman (Vera) into a Bizarro-like monstrosity. And the fight I mentioned prior between Superman and himself is yet another Bizarro stand-in. Just use Brainiac and Bizarro.

Not gonna lie, Robot Vera gave me nightmares as a kid. But here’s where we get into the not-so-nice points. Richard Pryor was shoehorned into this movie. Superman II leaned into slapstick and camp (more on that movie in a little while), so Superman III felt it had to market itself as a comedy. Pryor is a big name. Let’s squeeze him into Brainiac’s shoes. That’s not speculation. The studio has admitted they felt as if they “had to market Superman III” as a comedy. To his credit, Pryor wasn’t as annoying as I remembered. He can be annoying, but the script gave him little to work with, and the skiing sequence was stupid.

In general, the script stank. One could almost see what Superman III tried to do with its story (Brainiac and Bizarro) and changed course to match what they believed audiences wanted. And everything was about computers. Superman has powers, but we have computers. What powers the world? Computers. What can defeat Superman? Brainiac…I mean, computers. I cringed every time Robert Vaughn spoke about technology. He came off like Grandpa trying to explain the interwebs to the youngins, who, you know, grew up with computers. And don’t get me started on some of the graphics. I may have played the missile scene (a pixelated Superman dodges heat-seeking missiles) in an ’80s video game or two. Superman III wasn’t entirely bad, but it disappointed.

3) Superman II (1980)

I went into this rewatch of Superman movies thinking I’d put Superman II at number one, but the remaining movies on this list narrowly edge out Superman II. I’ll discuss those two movies in a moment. Before I go into Superman II’s shortcomings, let’s discuss what it gets right. Superman II does one thing modern superhero movies should adopt: gravity.

Literal gravity. Because Superman II had technical limitations, the movie’s four flying characters (Superman, General Zod, Ursa, and Nan) must occasionally land. This roots the viewer in what’s up and what’s down. It grants each blow more impact. The one I think of specifically is when Ursa mockingly calls for Superman, he turns to face her, and she throws a manhole cover into Supe’s midsection. Superman flies backwards, and while this is a dated (and comical) action sequence, it looks like it hurts. Black Panther is overall a better movie than Superman II, but the battle where Black Panther and Killmonger tumble in what looks like weightlessness doesn’t have the same impact.

I’ll add another bright spot for Superman II before listing some nits. I liked the character’s origin (and a few highlights from the previous movie) being recapped during the opening credits. I forgot Superman II did this. The MCU would be easier to keep up with if it did something similar. This wouldn’t work all the time, but I wouldn’t mind a refresher to cut down on MCU homework, and studios can stop force-feeding us character origins. Consider sliding an origin story into the movie’s opening credits.

Okay. We’ve reached the nitpicks. While Superman: The Movie has hints of comedy, Superman II includes actual slapstick comedy moments (Otis during the prison break). It isn’t too distracting, but these moments show what the movie franchise would become. Superman II leans more into camp. Again, the movie is still good, but this also shows the franchise’s direction. And then there are the powers. What is going on with these odd one-off superpowers? Superman: The Movie had Kal-El reverse the Earth’s rotation to turn back time. This is odd, but it makes Bizarro-World sense. Superman II says, Hold my beer.

Odd powers include: Saran wrap Superman logo, General Zod (and company) using telekinesis vision, a pod (ray) that turns Kryptonians into humans (which got switched off-camera into shielding a Kryptonian), and Superman having amnesic kisses. Most of these powers are very convenient for the plot, which is rather thin.

At its core, Superman II is a love story between Lois and Clark. I like this idea. Unfortunately, Superman II’s execution of this story was as clumsy as a Clark aw, shucks moment. Pair this with some other baffling choices (like why did Clark have to walk back to the Fortress of Solitude instead of bumming a ride from Lois? I didn’t understand this when I was a child and still don’t), and Superman II doesn’t shine quite as bright as our next two entries.

2) Superman Returns (2006)

I wasn’t expecting Superman Returns to be this watchable. I had to get over the cringe of seeing Kevin Spacey’s name (and watching him on-screen), but the man does a brilliant job as Lex Luthor. His performance is close enough to Gene Hackman’s while deviating until he made the character his own. The remaining cast followed suit, except for Frank Langella’s Perry White. Langella blends a hard-nosed, hard-working journalist with an editor who wants to sell numerous copies of the Daily Planet. Langella’s performance is a perfect marriage of Warfield (who took over the Planet in Superman IV) and the original Perry White. I’m impressed with Superman Returns’ acting and direction.

Even though Superman Returns’ runtime is the longest of all six movies ranked, it has good pacing. Were there a few moments that dragged a hair too long? Sure. But every Superman movie has those moments; Superman Returns may have the fewest of these moments. But many of the movie’s cool moments or story beats look and feel familiar. That’s because we’ve seen them in Superman: The Movie. This is why Superman Returns doesn’t take the top spot. Unlike Star Wars: The Force Awakens did with Star Wars: A New Hope, Superman Returns doesn’t lift all of Superman: The Movie’s story threads. The movie makes enough alterations.

But here are the similarities I found. Lex wants beachfront property and will murder millions of Americans to get it; he just switches coasts and the means. Lex’s woman accomplice grows a conscience and foils his plans at the last moment. Lex uses Kryptonite again, which didn’t happen as much as one might think in previous Superman movies, but it did in Superman: The Movie. These are major story beats and almost all of them came from the original, but Superman Returns, like the movie’s actors and their portrayals, it does take enough liberties to make the movie feel fresh.

I’ve waited long enough to mention the one plot point most people hated in Superman Returns: Lois and Clark’s son. The passage of time has softened my response to this storyline, but this doesn’t bother me. I can’t remember if Lois and Clark’s child bothered me in 2006. Recently, the two had a child in the comics. I mentioned this series in the Superman III write-up above, but I’ll reiterate it here. The story where Lois and Clark have a child and set roots in Smallville is one of the better Superman runs of the past decade to decade and a half. Had Superman Returns been released after this comic book run, more fans could’ve bought into Superman having a biological son with Lois. Regardless, I didn’t mind this story. It wasn’t handled the best–I would’ve tweaked a few things like Clark knowing he had a son–but it wasn’t a deal breaker.

But I do have a gripe that almost was a deal breaker. When is Superman Returns supposed to be set? Superman Returns takes place between ten and fifteen years after Superman II, so that would make the movie’s timeframe 1990 to 1995. Why does everyone have cellphones? Didn’t that happen in the early 2000s? Cellphones and other advanced technology may be the biggest head-scratchers, but Superman Returns holds a lot of anachronisms. The movie doesn’t know when it wants to be set. Still, Superman Returns is a good watch. Just turn off the switch in your brain that asks what time this is and allow the shock of Lois and Clark having a kid together to wane. Years later, Superman Returns is a surprisingly watchable movie.

1) Superman: The Movie (1978)

Yes! We have the original Superman (1978). I haven’t watched Superman: The Movie in years, decades perhaps. I forgot how the movie opens. A kid leafing through an issue of the Daily Planet is quaint. It made me smile. I got the vibe of a storybook mixed with the iconic newspaper where Clark and Lois work. The same can be said of the opening theme.

John Williams’ soundtracks always put me in a great mood. And then we’re treated to Jor-El (Superman’s birth father, portrayed by Marlon Brando) sentencing General Zod and his cronies to the Phantom Zone. Surprisingly, Superman: The Movie had the foresight to introduce the potential villain of its sequel. That didn’t happen often before the 2000s. In that sense, Superman: The Movie was ahead of its time.

Unlike Pa Kent’s death scene in Man of Steel, John Kent’s death of a heart attack in Superman: The Movie makes sense. Despite all Superman’s powers, he can’t save everyone, not even the ones closest to him. Pa Kent’s death scene in Superman: The Movie humanizes Clark Kent; it reminds him of the fragility of human life. I also like that Pa Kent’s death doesn’t serve to set up Kal-El as a reluctant hero like it did in Man of Steel. I hope 2025’s Superman abandons the reluctant superhero cliche.

I won’t go into a blow-by-blow for the remainder of Superman: The Movie. I was just shocked by how little I remembered from the movie’s opening and how groundbreaking some of these scenes were. Superman: The Movie may have flaws and be a product of its time, but it legitimized superhero movies. Oddly, it took over a decade for another major superhero film (Batman 1989) other than a Superman movie to grace the silver screen. No. I don’t count 1984’s Supergirl; unfortunately, it was a cash grab on the Superman movie franchise. I’m looking forward to a better Supergirl film.

Superman: The Movie takes a while to get going. Most of its early runtime revolves around Superman’s origin, but the movie does a great job telling this story. Movies like Superman 1978 do such a great job of showing a superhero’s origin that including an origin for well-known characters in modern superhero movies is a turnoff. I may like Superman II’s action more, but it does venture more into camp, and Superman Returns borrows more than a little of Superman: The Movie’s sugar to claim this top spot. Sometimes the original is the best.

That’s our list. How would you rate the previous Superman movies before this year’s film releases? Let us know in the comments. I can’t wait for Superman to release later this week. Except for Man of Steel, I had fun rewatching these movies. Yes. I even enjoyed rewatching Superman IV: The Quest for Peace. RIP, Christopher Reeve, Gene Hackman, and Margot Kidder. Thank you for reading, and wherever you are, I hope you’re having a great day.